Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Validating a .yml rule #64

Closed
jdsika opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #67
Closed

Validating a .yml rule #64

jdsika opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #67
Assignees
Labels
feature request Proposals which enhance the interface or add additional features.

Comments

@jdsika
Copy link
Contributor

jdsika commented Feb 28, 2024

As a user I want to make sure that a custom rule set that has been created manually is parsed and checked for validity. The parser module is currently handling errors like a misspelled rule (without saying in which line the error is). This parser should be extended.

@jdsika jdsika added the feature request Proposals which enhance the interface or add additional features. label Feb 28, 2024
@masipp
Copy link

masipp commented Mar 7, 2024

To add to this request we have the following usecase:
We want to be able to gather requirements from a provider of a sensor fmu so that we are able to

  1. Check if the currently used environment simulation provides all information necessary for a specific FMU
  2. Be able to approach the supplier of the environment simulation with new requirements

In order to make this possible the process of using the validator should be as userfriendly as possible to get high quality requirements.

The validation of the yaml files should therefore tell the user where an error has occured.
In addition it would be great if the user is provided with a schema of what he is allowed to fill the yaml files with that can be included in an IDE for autocompletion.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request Proposals which enhance the interface or add additional features.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants