-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 469
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Openfast Linux binary can't reproduce results #7
Comments
@sinolonghai Are you running this on Peregrine? can you share the location of the results, or upload them to this issue? |
Yes, on Peregrine: /scratch/hlong/ipcc/intel/OpenFAST |
Dr. Jason Jonkman told me that Tests 19-25 use random number generators to generate the input conditions for off shore wind turbines. Hence these tests might yield similar results when using the same compiler with different settings or on different systems; but different results across compilers. Are you getting differences only in Test 21 or all tests 19-25? |
@gantech Thanks for that tip. I had not realized that. @sinolonghai Have you tried other tests and do they also produce different results? @ghaymanNREL and I compared Test 1 and were able to ascertain that they produce the same results. Can you rerun that case and let us know if you find issues? If you still have issues, please point to the run directory where you have run the case. |
Thanks. Will try and let you know the results. |
@sinolonghai any news on this? |
@sinolonghai , please comment on this issue -- can it be closed? |
Successfully reproduced results for test1. Close the issue. |
Updated Visual Studio builds for Windows
Add openfast floating linear case to reg tests
Bug Fix: Wrong ErrStat preventing wave elev VTK outputs
I have compiled two versions of openfast in Linux/CMake using Intel and gcc respectively. And I compared their results for Test21 with the results in https://github.com/NWTC/FAST. The three results are just different with each other. Any one has an idea? I need a standard way to compile openfast so that I can use this as the benchmark.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: