-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
avoid multiple reads/writes for inherited properties in hydrator class #85
base: 4.2.x
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -7,8 +7,10 @@ | |
use CodeGenerationUtils\Inflector\Util\UniqueIdentifierGenerator; | ||
use GeneratedHydrator\CodeGenerator\Visitor\HydratorMethodsVisitor; | ||
use PhpParser\Node; | ||
use PhpParser\Node\Expr\Assign; | ||
use PhpParser\Node\Stmt\Class_; | ||
use PhpParser\Node\Stmt\ClassMethod; | ||
use PhpParser\NodeFinder; | ||
use PhpParser\ParserFactory; | ||
use PHPUnit\Framework\TestCase; | ||
use ReflectionClass; | ||
|
@@ -81,4 +83,106 @@ public function classAstProvider() : array | |
[$staticClassName, $parser->parse('<?php ' . $staticClassCode)[0], ['taz']], | ||
]; | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* @dataProvider propertyAstProvider | ||
*/ | ||
public function testPropertyCodeGeneration(string $className, Class_ $classNode, array $properties) : void | ||
{ | ||
$visitor = new HydratorMethodsVisitor(new ReflectionClass($className)); | ||
|
||
/** @var Class_ $modifiedAst */ | ||
$modifiedNode = $visitor->leaveNode($classNode); | ||
|
||
$constructors = $this->findConstructor($modifiedNode); | ||
self::assertCount(1, $constructors); | ||
$constructor = reset($constructors); | ||
|
||
$hydratePropertyNames = $this->findAssignedPropertyNames( | ||
$constructor, | ||
'hydrateCallbacks', | ||
'object', | ||
function (Assign $assign) { | ||
return $assign->var->name->name; | ||
} | ||
); | ||
$extractPropertyNames = $this->findAssignedPropertyNames( | ||
$constructor, | ||
'extractCallbacks', | ||
'values', | ||
function (Assign $assign) { | ||
return $assign->var->dim->value; | ||
} | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Not important, but There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ah sorry. didn't switch to spaces (working with tabs internally). There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. No worries: that is entirely my preference, and I just forgot to add PHPCS to the repo ;-) |
||
); | ||
|
||
self::assertSameSize($properties, $hydratePropertyNames); | ||
self::assertSameSize($properties, $extractPropertyNames); | ||
self::assertCount(0, array_diff($properties, $hydratePropertyNames)); | ||
self::assertCount(0, array_diff($properties, $extractPropertyNames)); | ||
} | ||
|
||
private function findConstructor(Class_ $class) : array { | ||
return array_filter( | ||
$class->stmts, | ||
static function (Node $node): bool { | ||
return $node instanceof ClassMethod && '__construct' === $node->name->name; | ||
} | ||
); | ||
} | ||
|
||
private function findAssignedPropertyNames(Node $node, string $callbackName, string $variableName, callable $mapper) | ||
{ | ||
$finder = new NodeFinder(); | ||
$callbacks = $finder->find($node, function(Node $node) use ($callbackName) { | ||
return $node instanceof Assign | ||
&& $node->var->var->name instanceof Node\Identifier | ||
&& $node->var->var->name->name === $callbackName; | ||
}); | ||
|
||
$found = []; | ||
foreach($callbacks as $callback) { | ||
/** @noinspection SlowArrayOperationsInLoopInspection */ | ||
$found = array_merge($found, $finder->find($callback, function(Node $node) use ($variableName) { | ||
return $node instanceof Assign | ||
&& is_string($node->var->var->name) | ||
&& $node->var->var->name === $variableName; | ||
})); | ||
} | ||
|
||
return array_map($mapper, $found); | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* @return Node[] | ||
*/ | ||
public function propertyAstProvider(): array | ||
{ | ||
$parser = (new ParserFactory())->create(ParserFactory::ONLY_PHP7); | ||
|
||
$className = UniqueIdentifierGenerator::getIdentifier('Foo'); | ||
$classCode = 'class '.$className.' { private $bar; private $baz; protected $tab; ' | ||
.'protected $tar; }'; | ||
|
||
eval($classCode); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hmm, interesting, I thought I made this library kinda side-effect free :| Guess I'll have more work to do. |
||
|
||
$subClassName = UniqueIdentifierGenerator::getIdentifier('Foo'); | ||
$subClassCode = 'class '.$subClassName.' extends '.$className.' { private $fuz; protected $buz; }'; | ||
|
||
eval($subClassCode); | ||
|
||
$sub2ClassName = UniqueIdentifierGenerator::getIdentifier('Foo'); | ||
$sub2ClassCode = 'class '.$sub2ClassName.' extends '.$subClassName.' { protected $bis; }'; | ||
|
||
eval($sub2ClassCode); | ||
|
||
return [ | ||
[$className, $parser->parse('<?php '.$classCode)[0], ['bar', 'baz', 'tab', 'tar']], | ||
[$subClassName, $parser->parse('<?php '.$subClassCode)[0], ['bar', 'baz', 'tab', 'tar', 'fuz', 'buz']], | ||
[ | ||
$sub2ClassName, | ||
$parser->parse('<?php '.$sub2ClassCode)[0], | ||
['bar', 'baz', 'tab', 'tar', 'fuz', 'buz', 'bis'], | ||
], | ||
]; | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, this code is indeed complex and fragile. I applaud your efforts!
Still, I was wondering if we could write something like this:
Is such a test feasible, in your opinion?
Also feasible: using the PHP-Parser pretty-printer to compare the AST via string rather than AST.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was also thinking about using the pretty-printer and comparing strings :) though you would not like it ;)
Not sure whether assertEquals really works on a deeply nested array with different objects.. does it?