-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Shortened Threat modeling section #358
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
* Use standard terminology throughout the document | ||
* Categorize the threat with respect to probability of occurrence | ||
and impact. | ||
* Have an [incident response][IR] idea in mind for each threat. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
typically we would not have an incident response to each threat, it should be a remediation instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, oversight on my part. I'll change that
* Architecture diagrams | ||
* Dataflow transitions | ||
* Data classifications | ||
**1 What to work on**? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The wording 'What are we working on?' is taken from the 4 questions, so we should keep that
@jgadsden Can this be closed now? |
Thanks for the revisions @pUrGe12 , and it should stay open for now because the page is not quite right. |
yep, that seems right.
…On Wed, 19 Feb, 2025, 8:42 pm Jon Gadsden, ***@***.***> wrote:
Thanks for the revisions @pUrGe12 <https://github.com/pUrGe12> , and it
should stay open for now because the page is not quite right.
Hard to put my finger on it, but Threat Modeling is a complex subject that
is highly nuanced, so the wording has to be very justifiable
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#358 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BER5OHZK6G2YWE2FDVRFV3T2QSNMVAVCNFSM6AAAAABXEHOB4CVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMNRYHE2DEMRYHE>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
[image: jgadsden]*jgadsden* left a comment
(OWASP/www-project-developer-guide#358)
<#358 (comment)>
Thanks for the revisions @pUrGe12 <https://github.com/pUrGe12> , and it
should stay open for now because the page is not quite right.
Hard to put my finger on it, but Threat Modeling is a complex subject that
is highly nuanced, so the wording has to be very justifiable
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#358 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BER5OHZK6G2YWE2FDVRFV3T2QSNMVAVCNFSM6AAAAABXEHOB4CVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMNRYHE2DEMRYHE>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Summary :
Shortened threat modeling section, included more in-doc links as discussed in #344
Description for the changelog :
Shortened threat modeling section.
closes #344