Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Shortened Threat modeling section #358

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Shortened Threat modeling section #358

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

pUrGe12
Copy link
Collaborator

@pUrGe12 pUrGe12 commented Feb 14, 2025

Summary :

Shortened threat modeling section, included more in-doc links as discussed in #344
Description for the changelog :

Shortened threat modeling section.

closes #344

* Use standard terminology throughout the document
* Categorize the threat with respect to probability of occurrence
and impact.
* Have an [incident response][IR] idea in mind for each threat.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typically we would not have an incident response to each threat, it should be a remediation instead?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, oversight on my part. I'll change that

* Architecture diagrams
* Dataflow transitions
* Data classifications
**1 What to work on**?
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The wording 'What are we working on?' is taken from the 4 questions, so we should keep that

@jgadsden jgadsden added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 14, 2025
@pUrGe12
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pUrGe12 commented Feb 19, 2025

@jgadsden Can this be closed now?

@jgadsden
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the revisions @pUrGe12 , and it should stay open for now because the page is not quite right.
Hard to put my finger on it, but Threat Modeling is a complex subject that is highly nuanced, so the wording has to be very justifiable

@pUrGe12
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pUrGe12 commented Feb 19, 2025 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make section on Threat Modeling more brief
2 participants