Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use inclusive language #801

Closed
tghosth opened this issue Jun 2, 2020 · 11 comments
Closed

Use inclusive language #801

tghosth opened this issue Jun 2, 2020 · 11 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@tghosth
Copy link
Collaborator

tghosth commented Jun 2, 2020

Placeholder to organise us to continue the changes which @danielcuthbert began in 23c983b to use language which is more inclusive.

@tghosth tghosth self-assigned this Jun 2, 2020
@tghosth
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tghosth commented Jun 2, 2020

Should also check for use of master/slave

@tghosth
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tghosth commented Jun 3, 2020

Man, male, female

@danielcuthbert
Copy link
Collaborator

This is a really important aspect about the standard. Most standards today, in my opinion, make use of strong language that doesn't translate well to other languages, terms that are no longer welcoming or inclusive and it's our responsibility to help be the change.

Appreciate any effort by the community to make this better, so thank you up front.

@jmanico
Copy link
Member

jmanico commented Jun 5, 2020 via email

@tghosth
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tghosth commented Jun 8, 2020

Our main branch is called master 🤦‍♂️

@jmanico
Copy link
Member

jmanico commented Jun 8, 2020 via email

@elarlang
Copy link
Collaborator

elarlang commented Jun 9, 2020

Let’s change it to better words.. Replace master with say freedom or liberty or equality Yea rename it equality

Maybe I just live in this part of the world then I don't realize or feel this problem.. but this a bit too much in my opinion.

What problems we solve with that change vs what problems we create with that change?

I think we don't hurt anyone's feelings when the branch name is like it is default and used in entire industry. It makes it clear, understandable and usable. If it's not default, it creates overhead - "hey, where is your master branch, where should I send my pull request?"

I don't want to open any political discussion here.

@jmanico
Copy link
Member

jmanico commented Jun 9, 2020 via email

@tghosth
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tghosth commented Jun 10, 2020

So my suggestion would be to change "master" branch to "main" and I don't think this super complicated. https://www.hanselman.com/blog/EasilyRenameYourGitDefaultBranchFromMasterToMain.aspx

I would however wait to make sure we are sure before doing this as it is a very major change

@tghosth
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tghosth commented Jun 16, 2020

  • Master only appears in a URL in 0x03-Using-ASVS.md which we would need to change if we change the branch name.
  • Black/whitelist references have all been removed from 4.0.2 and master branches.
  • male/man/men/female/him/his not in use.

Next task is to go through: https://developers.google.com/style/inclusive-documentation

@tghosth
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tghosth commented Jul 13, 2020

crazy, insane, blind, cripple, dumb

Replaced native with built-in 49d63c5

I think that is everything for now...

@tghosth tghosth closed this as completed Jul 13, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants