gitkraken: fix invalid darwin hash

[nicolas-goudry]

Fixes #352944

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[kirillrdy]

this is just to check that it evals

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 352981

---

x86_64-linux

re hash, they probably re-uploaded the zip file, if some one has old file, would be good to have a look what changec

[nicolas-goudry]

@kirillrdy I may also have messed up.

Does ofborg builds darwin? I remember there was something like an issue preventing it to run on darwin. But I may be wrong.

If ofborg does build, Axosoft may also have re-uploaded the zip as you told… Sadly, I cleaned my store before NixCon so I don’t have the old zip anymore.

[kirillrdy]

Ofborg doesn't build nonfree software