Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pymupdf: bundle mupdf package #352845

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

elohmeier
Copy link
Contributor

This ensures the mupdf Python module which is imported by the pymupdf module is present, without relying on propagatedBuildInputs (which is also currently broken, see fix in #334596). This enables compatibility with e.g. uv2nix / pyproject.nix and is more similar to the way the upstream PyPI package works.

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@elohmeier
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixes #332384

@FliegendeWurst
Copy link
Member

@ofborg build python312Packages.pymupdf

'')
+ ''
# bundle the `mupdf` module provided by mupdf-cxx
cp -r ${lib.getLib mupdf-cxx}/${python.sitePackages}/mupdf $out/${python.sitePackages}/mupdf
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could also use ln -s to save space.

@wegank wegank added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person label Nov 19, 2024
@dotlambda
Copy link
Member

I don't see why this is any better than #334596.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants