Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bitwarden: 2023.4.0 -> 2023.5.0 #235756

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2023
Merged

Conversation

f2k1de
Copy link
Contributor

@f2k1de f2k1de commented Jun 3, 2023

Description of changes
Things done
  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 23.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@f2k1de f2k1de force-pushed the bitwarden-2023.5 branch from ed8a315 to eaed262 Compare June 3, 2023 12:18
@f2k1de f2k1de marked this pull request as ready for review June 3, 2023 12:18
@f2k1de f2k1de requested review from Kiwi and amarshall June 3, 2023 12:18
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1 labels Jun 3, 2023
Copy link
Member

@amarshall amarshall left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Tested x86-linux build and basic functionality.

url = "https://github.com/bitwarden/clients/pull/5205.patch";
hash = "sha256-sKSrh8RHXtxGczyZScjTeiGZgTZCQ7f45ULj/j9cp6M=";
})
];
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can remove the fetchpatch param to the fn now.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could get rid of the whole applyPatches layer too, right?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, though I almost prefer to keep it so it’s a bit easier and more obvious how to add patches in the future. I did open #236370 with the aim of reducing the unnecessary intermediate drv in scenarios like this.

@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from amarshall June 9, 2023 19:44
@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 merged commit 5233b6d into NixOS:master Jun 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants