-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lima: 0.13.0 -> 0.14.2 #205976
lima: 0.13.0 -> 0.14.2 #205976
Conversation
@@ -8,16 +8,16 @@ | |||
|
|||
buildGoModule rec { | |||
pname = "lima"; | |||
version = "0.13.0"; | |||
version = "0.14.0"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
v0.14.1 now available
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems not to compile anyway just now: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/205976/checks?check_run_id=10079994627
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe it requires macOS Ventura (version>=13.0) ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, I checked and it needs xcrun to detect the version of macos, and build with/without the new virtualization lib (there is a -tags "no_vz"
added if not on Ventura)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And I have a feeling that it requires codesign
in order to be able to use the new virtualization framework :(
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Opened #206285 for fixing all that.
Made a separate PR for v0.14.1 with fixes needed with v0.14.0 and onward #206285 |
Automatic update generated by nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from https://github.com/lima-vm/lima/releases. meta.description for lima is: "Linux virtual machines (on macOS, in most cases)" meta.homepage for lima is: "https://github.com/lima-vm/lima" meta.changelog for lima is: "" Updates performed
To inspect upstream changesImpactChecks done (click to expand)
Rebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand)
Instructions to test this update (click to expand)Either download from Cachix:
(The Cachix cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.) Or, build yourself:
After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries:
Pre-merge build resultsWe have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages. Result of 2 packages built:
Maintainer pingscc @voanhduy1512 for testing. |
ccf9cfd
to
18aa9bf
Compare
Superseded by #206285. |
Automatic update generated by nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from https://github.com/lima-vm/lima/releases.
meta.description for lima is: "Linux virtual machines (on macOS, in most cases)"
meta.homepage for lima is: "https://github.com/lima-vm/lima"
meta.changelog for lima is: ""
Updates performed
To inspect upstream changes
Release on GitHub
Compare changes on GitHub
Impact
Checks done (click to expand)
passthru.tests
, if any, passedRebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand)
Instructions to test this update (click to expand)
Either download from Cachix:
(The Cachix cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.)
For the Cachix download to work, your user must be in the
trusted-users
list or you can usesudo
since root is effectively trusted.Or, build yourself:
After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries:
Pre-merge build results
We have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to
this change.
This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages.
Note sometimes packages show up as failed to build independent of the
change, simply because they are already broken on the target branch.
Result of
nixpkgs-review
run on x86_64-linux 12 packages built:
Maintainer pings
cc @voanhduy1512 for testing.