-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
opentelemetry-collector: 0.31.0 -> 0.33.0 #135243
opentelemetry-collector: 0.31.0 -> 0.33.0 #135243
Conversation
Can't build it on darwin:
Will wait for ofborg: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/135243/checks?check_run_id=3392948661 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ofborg hit the same failure.
It is just failing for darwin. We could ignore that because the error seems strange for me. |
I don't think we should ignore it, it's a regression, the current version works on darwin. |
sure, but do you have a darwin machine and know how to fix it? I don't and darwin is a 2nd class citizen because of those weird breakages and that it is harder to test for people. |
I think any change is hard to test on hardware you don't own, but we shouldn't merge in changes that break a system just because of that, and ofborg is there to catch unintentional breakages. One can test changes on hardware they don't have access to using vms. A cursory search for macos vms shows up https://github.com/myspaghetti/macos-virtualbox for example. Can't vouch whether it's any good or not, I do have a darwin machine, so I have only needed to set up linux vms. |
I don't think it is, the set of packages on it is definitely smaller than on linux, but I see it as just as supported as any non-nixos linux. |
This seems to be related: https://groups.google.com/g/golang-nuts/c/sh4bxSnfY3w. |
Related upstream issue: open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib#5425 You can get around this by building without cgo (passing |
Related discussion on whether darwin breakages should block updates and how darwin maintainers might not be able to handle the load of reviewing / addressing darwin specific issues: NixOS/rfcs#112 |
Sorry after more discussion in NixOS/rfcs#112 I've realised I was wrong to block this PR because of darwin compatibility, it is ok to proceed by marking darwin as broken. |
Preparing a new PR to bump to |
New PR up, supersedes this one: #145283. |
Automatic update generated by nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/releases.
meta.description for opentelemetry-collector is: "OpenTelemetry Collector"
meta.homepage for opentelemetry-collector is: "https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector"
meta.changelog for opentelemetry-collector is: ""
Updates performed
To inspect upstream changes
Release on GitHub
Compare changes on GitHub
Impact
Checks done (click to expand)
built on NixOS
The tests defined in
passthru.tests
, if any, passed/nix/store/lfz2l8lyzrj0yqya3gbd0n8md4bf2f1i-opentelemetry-collector-0.33.0/bin/otelcontribcol passed the binary check.
1 of 1 passed binary check by having a zero exit code.
0 of 1 passed binary check by having the new version present in output.
found 0.33.0 with grep in /nix/store/lfz2l8lyzrj0yqya3gbd0n8md4bf2f1i-opentelemetry-collector-0.33.0
found 0.33.0 in filename of file in /nix/store/lfz2l8lyzrj0yqya3gbd0n8md4bf2f1i-opentelemetry-collector-0.33.0
directory tree listing: https://gist.github.com/dad6082140a4cbc888981286aeadd904
du listing: https://gist.github.com/1e93f92a6d0f6325cd49715cd6ee55c6
Rebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand)
Instructions to test this update (click to expand)
Either download from Cachix:
(The Cachix cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.)
For the Cachix download to work, your user must be in the
trusted-users
list or you can usesudo
since root is effectively trusted.Or, build yourself:
After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries:
Pre-merge build results
We have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to
this change.
This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages.
Note sometimes packages show up as failed to build independent of the
change, simply because they are already broken on the target branch.
Result of
nixpkgs-review
run on x86_64-linux 11 package built:
Maintainer pings
cc @uri-canva @kalbasit for testing.