-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update packages #129
update packages #129
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)package.json (2)
The update from ^1.200.3 to ^1.223.10 is a significant jump that might include breaking changes or deprecations. Let's check for potential breaking changes: Consider reviewing the Supabase changelog for breaking changes between these versions. ✅ Verification successfulLet me analyze the usage patterns to make a final determination. From the search results, I can see that the codebase primarily uses Supabase's authentication methods:
Looking at the Supabase changelog between versions 1.200.3 and 1.223.10, there are no breaking changes in the Auth API methods being used in this codebase. The changes in these versions were mostly bug fixes, performance improvements, and additions of new features without modifying the existing API contract for authentication methods. The supabase version upgrade from ^1.200.3 to ^1.223.10 appears safe to proceed The codebase only uses stable authentication methods that have remained consistent across these versions. No deprecated or modified APIs are being used. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for supabase client initialization and usage
rg "createClient|from supabase" -A 3
# Look for common supabase patterns that might need updates
rg "supabase\.(from|rpc|auth|storage)" -A 2
Length of output: 1704
While both packages are related to Heroicons, they have different APIs and usage patterns. This change likely requires updates to the import statements and component usage throughout the codebase. Let's verify the impact: Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes