-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 145
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MOM6 time #494
Comments
see #494 for discusion. I'm still not sure whether write_time should match the obs or the model
Conclusion from standup July 13th 2023: write_model_time should be dart time for files created by dart. Existing model netcdf files do not have their time overwritten by dart. Note there is a DART/assimilation_code/modules/io/direct_netcdf_mod.f90 Lines 137 to 151 in 1b76f3a
|
see #494 for discusion. I'm still not sure whether write_time should match the obs or the model
The default in CESM is to run with no leap year.
For assimilating with real obs, we need to use the actual time.
Todos:
./xmlchange CALENDAR=GREGORIAN
Note on what happens if you don't set CALENDAR=GREGORIAN
mom6 restart file has time in days from year 1.
Starting the run at 2015-02-01:
If you don't have leap years switched on you end up with inconstant time information like this:
Restart filename has the time 2015-02-11-00000.
The Time variable is Time = 735151, which is 2013/10/11
read_model_time
read_model_time
is used for the move_ahead calculation. MOM6 Model time is days from year 1. This needs to be DART time (days from 1601) since that is what the observation times are.DART/assimilation_code/modules/assimilation/obs_model_mod.f90
Lines 57 to 65 in 502af78
Note the model_time for the whole ensemble is from the first ensemble member only:
DART/assimilation_code/modules/io/state_vector_io_mod.f90
Lines 288 to 292 in 502af78
write_model_time
, is used for dart created files: inflation, mean. Should this be MOM6 time (days from year 1) to be consistent with the model restarts? Or DART time (days from 1601) to be consistent with the observations?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: