Create choosing-rust.md

cheatsheets/rust/choosing-rust.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+# Choosing Rust
+
+## Reasons to consider before using Rust
+
+### Learning Curve
+
+Rust has a steep learning curve, particularly for developers transitioning from languages like Python or Java. The concepts of ownership, borrowing, and lifetimes can be quite challenging for newcomers. This complexity may lead to increased onboarding time and a potential slowdown in productivity as developers familiarize themselves with the language's unique features.
+
+### Development Speed
+
+While Rust is known for its safety and performance, the strict compiler checks can slow down the development process. Developers may find themselves spending more time resolving compiler errors and warnings, which can lead to longer iteration cycles compared to more permissive languages. This can be a significant consideration for projects with tight deadlines.
+
+### Finding Talent
+
+The demand for Rust developers is on the rise, but the supply remains limited. This scarcity can make it challenging for organizations to find qualified staff who are proficient in Rust. As a result, companies may face difficulties in building teams or may need to invest in training existing employees, which can be time-consuming and costly.
+
+### Community and Support
+
+Although Rust boasts a supportive and enthusiastic community, it is still smaller compared to more established languages like C++ or Java. This can result in fewer resources, libraries, and frameworks available for developers. Consequently, teams may encounter challenges in finding solutions to specific problems or may need to invest more time in developing custom tools.
+
+### Memory Management
+
+Rust provides memory safety without the need for a garbage collector, which is a significant advantage. However, this can lead to more complex memory management compared to C++. In C++, developers have a more straightforward approach with manual memory management, which some may find easier to work with in certain scenarios, particularly when performance is critical.
+
+### Ecosystem Maturity
+
+Rust's ecosystem is still evolving, and while it has made significant progress, some libraries and tools may not be as mature or feature-rich as those available in older languages. This can result in increased development time as teams may need to build custom solutions or work around limitations in existing libraries.
+
+### Performance Trade-offs
+
+Although Rust is designed for performance, certain use cases may still benefit from the optimizations available in C++ or other languages. In high-performance computing scenarios, the fine-tuned control over system resources that C++ offers can sometimes lead to better performance outcomes, making it a more suitable choice for specific applications.
+
+### Tooling and IDE Support
+
+While Rust has made strides in tooling and IDE support, it may not yet match the level of integration and features available for more established languages. Developers may find that popular IDEs lack some of the advanced functionalities they are accustomed to, which can hinder productivity and make the development experience less seamless.