-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: change types signatures verifyingContract validation to allow 'cosmos' as address #334
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ | |
* | ||
* @param address - The address to validate and normalize. | ||
* @param req - The request object. | ||
* @returns {string} - The normalized address, if valid. Otherwise, throws | ||
Check warning on line 429 in src/wallet.ts GitHub Actions / Build, lint, and test / Lint (18.x)
Check warning on line 429 in src/wallet.ts GitHub Actions / Build, lint, and test / Lint (20.x)
Check warning on line 429 in src/wallet.ts GitHub Actions / Build, lint, and test / Lint (22.x)
|
||
* an error | ||
*/ | ||
async function validateAndNormalizeKeyholder( | ||
|
@@ -464,7 +464,13 @@ | |
*/ | ||
function validateVerifyingContract(data: string) { | ||
const { domain: { verifyingContract } = {} } = parseTypedMessage(data); | ||
if (verifyingContract && !isValidHexAddress(verifyingContract)) { | ||
// Explicit check for cosmos here has been added to address this issue | ||
// https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-json-rpc-middleware/issues/new | ||
if ( | ||
verifyingContract && | ||
(verifyingContract as string) !== 'cosmos' && | ||
!isValidHexAddress(verifyingContract) | ||
) { | ||
throw rpcErrors.invalidInput(); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We're going to introduce this single exception? Doesn't it seem possible there are other cases here that we're going to be chasing? Do we have a plan to deprecate support for this exception and start enforcing this more strictly or?
cc @MetaMask/wallet-api-platform-engineers
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cosmos network DAPPs are using this deprecated SDK which has verifyingContract hard coded to
cosmos
https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/blob/main/ethereum/eip712/domain.go#L29 thus we need to do it to support cosmos network. Once this old library goes out of use we can revert the change.We do not see more such cases currently.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if I understand correctly we are planning on removing this sometime in the future: if so, to make sure we don't lose track of it, perhaps we can open a new issue and mention it in the code comment instead of using the issue that will be closed by this PR (#26980)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point @mikesposito , I added this issue #337 and updated the comment.