Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update exception handling #175
Update exception handling #175
Changes from all commits
a42a727
078291d
2d179ab
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
SkippedRecordEvent
looks great, slots right in.For posterity's sake, just commenting that in our discussion, we had also talked about how more granular exceptions, e.g. invalid records, records with runtime-y errors, or otherwise, could extend
SkippedRecordEvent
to still trigger this code path of "skipping" a record.Lastly, related to this comment in the PR,
If within code we set a custom message on the
SkippedRecordEvent
, maybe this would be good place to log that? That would allow setting the exception + message deep in code, confident it would bubble up here and get logged.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm unable to comment on the lines below, as they did not change, but thoughts on updating the logic to treat a successful record as the default path?
I know this will get touched on in orchestration updates, but while touching this
__next__
method, thought it could be a good time to nudge it.e.g.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good call on the exception message and I was frustrated with the repetition in that method so thank you very much for such a simple refactor!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
I might suggest as we revist raising these in the future that we have a convention of positional
message
and then named arguments (e.g.source_record_id=source_record_id
), but not blocking now as this definitely works too!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like this idea, too!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 , I agree with that pattern as well going forward