Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix!: bump ethermint to fix EIP712 message signing #2042

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

pirtleshell
Copy link
Member

Description

Previous version of ethermint used a value for the verifyingContract in the domain separator that was not compliant with the spec. This field and salt, which was unused, have been removed.

This is a state breaking change because it changes which EIP712 txs are considered valid, and therefore, which txs are allowed to be included in a block.

Checklist

  • Changelog has been updated as necessary.

Previous version of ethermint used a value for the `verifyingContract`
in the domain separator that was not compliant with the spec. This field
and `salt`, which was unused, have been removed.

This is a state breaking change because it changes which EIP712 txs are
considered valid, and therefore, which txs are allowed to be included in
a block.
@pirtleshell pirtleshell changed the title deps!: bump ethermint to fix EIP712 message signing fix!: bump ethermint to fix EIP712 message signing Oct 28, 2024
Copy link
Member

@drklee3 drklee3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we include the test from #2021 to confirm the patch is integrated properly with the ante handler 😃

@pirtleshell
Copy link
Member Author

discussed with @drklee3 who will cherry-pick #2021 onto the release branch 🙏

@pirtleshell pirtleshell merged commit 9d10634 into release/v0.27.x Oct 31, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@pirtleshell pirtleshell deleted the rp-bump-ethermint branch October 31, 2024 16:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants