Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inline and use a non-splatting combine_axes in broadcast #35260

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 25, 2020

Conversation

ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

DifferentialEquations.jl has been carrying around a patch

https://github.com/SciML/DiffEqBase.jl/blob/master/src/diffeqfastbc.jl#L18

for awhile which stops allocations like https://discourse.julialang.org/t/strange-allocations-during-broadcasting/26605/5 due to lack of inlining and due to splatting. It would probably be good to upstream this?

@mbauman

DifferentialEquations.jl has been carrying around a patch

https://github.com/SciML/DiffEqBase.jl/blob/master/src/diffeqfastbc.jl#L18

for awhile which stops allocations like https://discourse.julialang.org/t/strange-allocations-during-broadcasting/26605/5 due to lack of inlining and due to splatting. It would probably be good to upstream this?
@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member Author

This code was from @YingboMa so he might comment as well.

ChrisRackauckas and others added 2 commits March 25, 2020 14:12
Co-Authored-By: Kristoffer Carlsson <kristoffer.carlsson@chalmers.se>
@mbauman
Copy link
Member

mbauman commented Mar 25, 2020

I've found it helpful to add @allocated tests to ensure these sorts of crucial things don't regress. They can sometimes be a pain, but I think a case like this is worth it. As simple as:

u = rand(100)
k1 = similar(u)
k2 = similar(u)
k3 = similar(u)
k4 = similar(u)
f(a,b,c,d,e) = @. a = a + 1*(b+c+d+e)
@allocated f(u,k1,k2,k3,k4)
@test (@allocated f(u,k1,k2,k3,k4)) == 0

@mbauman mbauman added broadcast Applying a function over a collection performance Must go faster labels Mar 25, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@YingboMa YingboMa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@KristofferC KristofferC merged commit cc60547 into JuliaLang:master Mar 25, 2020
oxinabox pushed a commit to oxinabox/julia that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2020
…5260)

* Inline and use a non-splatting combine_axes in broadcast
* test to ensure no allocations
ravibitsgoa pushed a commit to ravibitsgoa/julia that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2020
…5260)

* Inline and use a non-splatting combine_axes in broadcast
* test to ensure no allocations
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2020
* Inline and use a non-splatting combine_axes in broadcast
* test to ensure no allocations
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas deleted the patch-6 branch April 16, 2020 16:34
ChrisRackauckas added a commit to SciML/DiffEqBase.jl that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
broadcast Applying a function over a collection performance Must go faster
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants