-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 238
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CUFFT] Preallocate a buffer for complex-to-real FFT #2578
Merged
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
605b2c9
[CUFFT] Preallocate a buffer for complex-to-real FFT
amontoison 06d482e
Update cufft.jl
amontoison e346447
Fix new errors in fft.jl
amontoison 9952a3e
More fixes in fft.jl
amontoison 4ab92e7
Allocate a buffer in both plan_rfft and plan_brfft
amontoison bfb0a45
Allocate a buffer in both plan_rfft and plan_brfft
amontoison 737b35c
Update lib/cufft/fft.jl
amontoison 6f82697
Merge branch 'master' into cufft_buffer
amontoison File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A dedicated typevar instead of simply
Union{Nothing,CuArray}
seems overkill, but I guess you want to eliminate the partial type information?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, and I also take this PR as an opportunity to have a concrete type for
region
in the structure.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I trust you have good reasons for this, but it's not always advantageous to do so. The CUTENSOR wrappers, for example, cause excessive specialization for little gain, since these calls are very coarse-grained anyway (yet leading to very long test times). In this case, though, the specialization is already there (since
B
doesn't introduced new information already contained ininplace
andT
).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't changed the dispatch for the high-level FFT routines, so I didn't expect any slowdown. I simply made the low-level structure fully inferable.
I'll run a quick regression test for
fft
/ifft
before and after this PR to check if there's any noticeable difference.I didn't test it without the type
B
in the structure, but I observed a nice speed-up in my code when adding the buffer inside forrfft
/irfft
.Julia also stopped crashing due to OOM issues.