Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Default to accepting either master or main as the devbranch #1727
Default to accepting either master or main as the devbranch #1727
Changes from 1 commit
0f2147d
e60cdaa
f3a97fe
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Before I was considering also allowing
dev
.But the only repo i know that uses
dev
is MLJ, and they do not see thedevbranch=dev
argument.And so accepting that would potentially break their workflow.
https://github.com/alan-turing-institute/MLJ.jl/blob/96562a60a70aebc3f0d768147ff9dab4549ddfa5/docs/make.jl#L98-L101
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we can just delete this whole condition and warning message?
(and the other several copies of it for the other CI providers)
It seems like people are not going to do it by mistake anymore, with the new default?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mortenpi you added this warning in #1489
what do you think of just removing it?