Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run CI on tags #118

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 16, 2023
Merged

Run CI on tags #118

merged 6 commits into from
Oct 16, 2023

Conversation

gdalle
Copy link
Member

@gdalle gdalle commented Oct 12, 2023

Hopefully fixes the lack of a stable docs build

@gdalle gdalle requested a review from devmotion October 12, 2023 16:58
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 12, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (d36bb00) 82.94% compared to head (45fbe16) 82.94%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #118   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.94%   82.94%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         428      428           
=======================================
  Hits          355      355           
  Misses         73       73           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@devmotion
Copy link
Member

devmotion commented Oct 12, 2023

Why don't we have a separate Docs.yml action? There's no need to rerun CI tests on tags, we only need the docs.

@gdalle
Copy link
Member Author

gdalle commented Oct 12, 2023

I guess it doesn't hurt to prove that the tests pass specifically for the tag you want. Otherwise if you wanna check you have to go back in time and look for the tests of the associated commit. But I don't feel strongly about either option

@devmotion
Copy link
Member

I think it's sufficient to run CI once for every commit. If you go to a tag, you also end up with the commit with the CI runs next to it.

@gdalle
Copy link
Member Author

gdalle commented Oct 12, 2023

Alright, I'll split out a docs workflow tomorrow

.github/workflows/Docs.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/Docs.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
gdalle and others added 2 commits October 15, 2023 19:20
Co-authored-by: David Widmann <devmotion@users.noreply.github.com>
@gdalle gdalle requested a review from devmotion October 15, 2023 17:34
test/runtests.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Member

@devmotion devmotion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

Project.toml Show resolved Hide resolved
@gdalle gdalle merged commit 211b675 into master Oct 16, 2023
7 checks passed
@gdalle gdalle deleted the gd/docsbuild branch October 16, 2023 08:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants