-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make wrap fields also visible in entry editor #6315
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0b39116
Make wrap fields also visible in entry editor
Siedlerchr 4dab523
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into multiline
Siedlerchr 7d21e06
change comment
Siedlerchr 1dc4fc5
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into multiline
Siedlerchr 3fdb701
add changelog
Siedlerchr e99a550
Merge branch 'master' into multiline
Siedlerchr File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -23,12 +23,10 @@ public PersonsEditor(final Field field, | |
final SuggestionProvider<?> suggestionProvider, | ||
final JabRefPreferences preferences, | ||
final FieldCheckers fieldCheckers, | ||
final boolean isSingleLine) { | ||
final boolean isMultiLine) { | ||
this.viewModel = new PersonsEditorViewModel(field, suggestionProvider, preferences.getAutoCompletePreferences(), fieldCheckers); | ||
|
||
textInput = isSingleLine | ||
? new EditorTextField() | ||
: new EditorTextArea(); | ||
textInput = isMultiLine ? new EditorTextArea() : new EditorTextField(); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Not that the true/false branches were just be wrapped. Another indicator for an enum! |
||
|
||
decoratedStringProperty = new UiThreadStringProperty(viewModel.textProperty()); | ||
textInput.textProperty().bindBidirectional(decoratedStringProperty); | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we use an
enum
here? I really don't like the booleans - and we see changing the flag fromsingleLine
tomultiLine
was necessary of readability. (Otherweise, the variable would be kept to flagsingleLine
- and negation would be used)I propose to use a boolean enum as proposed at https://stackoverflow.com/a/12713550/873282
Maybe, just a simple enum would also be OK. Then, the construction from boolean would be a bit more tricky though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you want to go in this direction, an enum
FieldType
withText
andTextLong
would make the most sense and conveys the semantics. Can then be extended in the future to includeKeywords
,Numeric
etc.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I really would like to leave it for the moment and implement a more generic solution in a follow up PR. I think about integrating it in the custom entry types dialog.