Revert 98f3b05df to see if sources are visible on coveralls.io #1439
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
91f72a4 to
c10388f
Compare
|
@ZzEeKkAa Want your thoughts on this PR. The issue is after switching to official coveralls action, coveralls.io does not show any source files. Reverting the change does show the sources. |
c10388f to
2c607bf
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reverts 98f3b05 Coveralls.io does not display the sources for numba-dpex anymore. The PR triages if the problem is due to the official coveralls workflow.
Although not showing sources is a feature and not a bug (lemurheavy/coveralls-public#1579), the sources are displayed for dpctl and dpnp. So, let us see what happens if we go back to what was there before.