Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

duplicity 0.8.09 #48881

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

duplicity 0.8.09 #48881

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

middagj
Copy link
Contributor

@middagj middagj commented Jan 11, 2020

  • Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
  • Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
  • Have you built your formula locally with brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
  • Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
  • Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing brew install <formula>)?

Upgrade to 0.8.09. I downgraded dropbox to 6.9.0 (again). The reason is that it is explicitly locked to that version in the source. Apart form that, the source now uses b2sdk instead of b2 and boto3 (next to boto which is now deprecated). I updated the poet command to reflect these changes.

I also upgraded to Python3 as part of #47274. The 0.8 branch is Python 3 ready.

@issyl0 issyl0 added the python Python use is a significant feature of the PR or issue label Jan 11, 2020
@fxcoudert
Copy link
Member

Note python is already Python 3.7
But upgrading to 3.8 should be fine. @bayandin is that OK with you?

@fxcoudert fxcoudert mentioned this pull request Jan 11, 2020
@bayandin
Copy link
Member

But upgrading to 3.8 should be fine. @bayandin is that OK with you?

Nothing with python depends on duplicity and it got installed into venv, so it should be ok.

@fxcoudert fxcoudert closed this in 7858176 Jan 11, 2020
@middagj middagj deleted the feature/duplicity branch January 12, 2020 07:30
@lock lock bot added the outdated PR was locked due to age label Feb 11, 2020
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 11, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
outdated PR was locked due to age python Python use is a significant feature of the PR or issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants