chore: export test and cli utilities in fuels umbrella package

[nedsalk]

I exported the utils via the fuels umbrella package and changed imports to import from fuels accordingly. The changes in this PR are exclusively tied to that and running pnpm lint:fix afterwards.

• closes Export [test] utilities in umbrella package #2223

[petertonysmith94]

I'll approve

I think we should test the next tagged CLI after it's merged into release :)

[maschad]

This looks fine, but a naive search in my code editor shows up 134 files, could we be missing some changes here? Or am I miscalculating?

[nedsalk]

@maschad you searched for /test-utils which is showing results for fuels/test-utils, @fuel-ts/utils/test-utls, @fuel-ts/account/test-utils, etc. This consolidates it all to use import from fuels/test-utils.

[maschad]

I checked out onto this branch there are still a number of files that import from:

• @fuel-ts/errors/test-utils
• @fuel-ts/account/test-utils
• @fuel-ts/utils/test-utils

There's also some outdated docs / snippets such as:

• https://github.com/FuelLabs/fuels-ts/blob/ns/chore/export-utilities-in-umbrella-package/packages/account/README.md#L50
• https://github.com/FuelLabs/fuels-ts/blob/ns/chore/export-utilities-in-umbrella-package/apps/docs-snippets/src/guide/wallets/test-wallets.test.ts#L12

[maschad]

@maschad you searched for /test-utils which is showing results for fuels/test-utils, @fuel-ts/utils/test-utls, @fuel-ts/account/test-utils, etc. This consolidates it all to use import from fuels/test-utils.

Thanks for the clarification, if you update the search to be explicit for @fuel-ts/errors/test-utils
@fuel-ts/account/test-utils and @fuel-ts/utils/test-utils you will see quite a few files. I've elaborated more here

[danielbate]

@maschad we should still be importing from the mono packages themselves rather than the umbrella inside the packages though shouldn't we? Filter your search to check only where we are installing fuels i.e. packages/fuel-gauge and docs-snippets. But you're correct around outdated docs.

[nedsalk]

@danielbate is right in #2637 (review).

As for the snippets and some leftovers that I didn't fix, I fixed them in f980df5 and 5131778.

[maschad]

Thanks for the clarification @danielbate

Good job @nedsalk

[github-actions]

Coverage Report:

Lines	Branches	Functions	Statements
79.54%(+0%)	71.37%(+0%)	76.91%(+0%)	79.62%(+0%)

Changed Files:

Coverage values did not change👌.