Added the minimal example

[n9wxu]

Description

minimal build example

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (2be332a) 93.66% compared to head (c873de9) 93.66%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #823   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.66%   93.66%           
=======================================
  Files           6        6           
  Lines        2526     2526           
  Branches      604      604           
=======================================
  Hits         2366     2366           
  Misses        107      107           
  Partials       53       53           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	93.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[n9wxu]

/bot run formatting

[n9wxu]

Removed a newline

[Skptak]

In general I am confused what the minimal_freertos_example/main.c file. To me it seems like an objectively worse version of the Posix_GCC/main.c, the WIN32-MSVC-Static-Allocation-Only, the WIN32-MSVC, or the WIN32-MingW main.c files?

[n9wxu]

/bot run formatting

[amazonKamath]

In general I am confused what the minimal_freertos_example/main.c file. To me it seems like an objectively worse version of the Posix_GCC/main.c, the WIN32-MSVC-Static-Allocation-Only, the WIN32-MSVC, or the WIN32-MingW main.c files?

I understand this is a minimal "build" example, than an example demonstrating functionality.

[Skptak]

In general I am confused what the minimal_freertos_example/main.c file. To me it seems like an objectively worse version of the Posix_GCC/main.c, the WIN32-MSVC-Static-Allocation-Only, the WIN32-MSVC, or the WIN32-MingW main.c files?

I understand this is a minimal "build" example, than an example demonstrating functionality.

But if it's a "minimal build example" it should be called that, or contain that information.
This file directly states:
/* This is a simple main that will start freertos and run a periodic task */

In my opinion, if the only reason this file exists is for static analysis it should probably just live in .github directory. If it's meant to be a true sample main.c file it should have info that would help a new user use it and turn it into an actual main.c file

[Skptak]

/bot run formatting

[n9wxu]

/bot run formatting

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
No Duplication information