Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bgpd: fix failing to compile on 32 bit systems #1594

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 4, 2018

Conversation

donaldsharp
Copy link
Member

-Werror=sign-compare is failing with signed/unsigned usage
in the conditional expression.

Fixes: #1593
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com

-Werror=sign-compare is failing with signed/unsigned usage
in the conditional expression.

Fixes: FRRouting#1593
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
@LabN-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

LabN-CI commented Jan 4, 2018

💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed

Results table
_ _
Result SUCCESS git merge/1594 8356e9b
Date 01/04/2018
Start 05:50:09
Finish 06:13:03
Run-Time 22:54
Total 1808
Pass 1808
Fail 0
Valgrind-Errors 0
Valgrind-Loss 0
Details vncregress-2018-01-04-05:50:09.txt
Log autoscript-2018-01-04-05:50:51.log.bz2

For details, please contact louberger

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-2250/

This is a comment from an EXPERIMENTAL automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.


CLANG Static Analyzer Summary

  • Github Pull Request 1594, comparing to Git base SHA 3cace9d

No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base

21 Static Analyzer issues remaining.

See details at
https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-2250/artifact/shared/static_analysis/index.html

@pguibert6WIND pguibert6WIND merged commit 9f465cc into FRRouting:master Jan 4, 2018
@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

See below for issues.
CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-2251/

This is a comment from an EXPERIMENTAL automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Get source and apply patch from patchwork: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

Fedora 24 rpm pkg check: Successful
Addresssanitizer topotest: Successful
Debian 8 deb pkg check: Successful
IPv4 protocols on Ubuntu 14.04: Successful
Debian 9 deb pkg check: Successful
IPv4 ldp protocol on Ubuntu 16.04: Successful
Ubuntu 14.04 deb pkg check: Successful
CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: Successful
Ubuntu 12.04 deb pkg check: Successful
Static analyzer (clang): Successful
CentOS 6 rpm pkg check: Successful
IPv6 protocols on Ubuntu 14.04: Successful
Ubuntu 16.04 deb pkg check: Successful

Topology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: Failed

Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1604-2251/test

Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64:

2018-01-04 05:07:52,645 ERROR: ******************************************************************************
2018-01-04 05:07:52,646 ERROR: Test Target Summary                                                  Pass Fail
2018-01-04 05:07:52,647 ERROR: ******************************************************************************
2018-01-04 05:07:52,647 ERROR: 3    r3     Adjacencies up +10.09 secs                               0    1
2018-01-04 05:07:52,647 ERROR: ******************************************************************************
2018-01-04 05:07:52,647 ERROR: Total 49                                                             39   1
2018-01-04 05:07:52,647 ERROR: ******************************************************************************
2018-01-04 05:07:52,647 ERROR: See /tmp/topotests/bgp_direct_to_bgp_vpn.test_bgp_direct_to_bgp_vpn/output.log for details of errors
2018-01-04 05:07:52,652 ERROR: assert failed at "bgp_direct_to_bgp_vpn.test_bgp_direct_to_bgp_vpn/test_run_lu_tests": 1 tests failed
assert '1 tests failed' == 'See summary output above'
  - 1 tests failed
  + See summary output above

see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-2251/artifact/TOPOU1604/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt

Topology Tests memory analysis: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-2251/artifact/TOPOU1604/MemoryLeaks/

CLANG Static Analyzer Summary

  • Github Pull Request 1594, comparing to Git base SHA 3cace9d

No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base

21 Static Analyzer issues remaining.

See details at
https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-2251/artifact/shared/static_analysis/index.html

@pguibert6WIND
Copy link
Member

Hi,
I may have merged this by mistake, I was thinking the fix was ok, because I had the same.
It looks like it is not enough?

@donaldsharp
Copy link
Member Author

@pguibert6WIND not sure yet, I'm rerunning the failed topotests now. I've personally seen a lot of failures the last few days of the topotests. I am not sure how this would cause a new failure though with what I have done. I am looking into it now.

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-2251/

This is a comment from an EXPERIMENTAL automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.


CLANG Static Analyzer Summary

  • Github Pull Request 1594, comparing to Git base SHA 3cace9d

No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base

21 Static Analyzer issues remaining.

See details at
https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-2251/artifact/shared/static_analysis/index.html

@donaldsharp donaldsharp deleted the 32_bit_fuckery branch March 24, 2018 23:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants