Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[No QA] Fix parsing bug in getStagingDeployCash #2771

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 10, 2021

Conversation

roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

@AndrewGable will you please review this?

Details

We've had a number of failed workflows (example), and as a result our deploy checklist has not been updating. That's because it was created under unusual circumstances, where no PRs were merged while the previous StagingDeployCash was locked, so there were no PRs to add to the issue description for the new checklist.

Fixed Issues

n/a

Tests

Added a unit test by copying the body of the current StagingDeployCash checklist.

QA Steps

none

Tested On

  • Github

@roryabraham roryabraham requested a review from AndrewGable May 10, 2021 21:54
@roryabraham roryabraham requested a review from a team as a code owner May 10, 2021 21:54
@roryabraham roryabraham self-assigned this May 10, 2021
@MelvinBot MelvinBot requested review from Jag96 and removed request for a team May 10, 2021 21:54
@AndrewGable AndrewGable merged commit 93a206a into main May 10, 2021
@AndrewGable AndrewGable deleted the Rory-FixGetStagingDeployCash branch May 10, 2021 23:02
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging in version: 1.0.41-6🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production in version: 1.0.44-0🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants