Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[navigation-refactor] Fix animation glitch when navigating in the browser history with swiping iOS Safari #22678

Conversation

adamgrzybowski
Copy link
Contributor

@adamgrzybowski adamgrzybowski commented Jul 11, 2023

Details

Description of the problem

This is a patch for react-navigation to remove animation glitches on iOS Safari. These glitches occur when the user wants to navigate in the browser history with the swipe gesture. Quick and partial animation of the transition from the previous page is visible after swiping.

To fix that we need to prevent transition animation for navigation done with gestures.

Solution

Gestures that would trigger navigation in the browser history generate broken touch events so this solution is based on this broken behavior. This will need a rework if the bugs with events in the iOS safari will be fixed.

This solution uses two different broken behaviors to detect if we should animate the transition.

  1. Gestures that would trigger going back in the browser history have a negative pageX value for the touchend event.
  2. Gestures that would trigger going forward in the browser history are ended immediately after starting without proper touchend event emitted.

Edge case

There is one small use case where the animation will be prevented and it shouldn't be:

  1. The user starts the gesture that would trigger going forward in the history but drops it before the threshold to actually trigger the navigation
  2. The user presses one of the browser arrows to navigate in the history.

After one prevented transition animation this solution will work normally until the next case like that.

Video with the example below:

Screen.Recording.2023-07-11.at.21.24.33.mov

Follow up

We may want to contact react-navigation maintainers to see if they are interested in including this solution in their repository. It's hacky but it works. Also, there is a related issue on their GitHub

Note

Those changes are relevant only for the iOS Safari version. They won't affect any other platform. But it's worth checking the Android web version.

Fixed Issues

$ #20886

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

Do these tests on iOS mobile

Test going back with swiping

  1. Open any report
  2. Swipe from left to right to go to the previous page. Do it quickly.
  3. Observe if there is any animation glitch. It would look like the animation of going back is run twice.

Test going back with the back button

  1. Open any report
  2. Press the browser back button
  3. There should be normal animation of going back (previous page animating from left to right)
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-07-11.at.21.21.04.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-07-11.at.20.57.55.mov
Desktop
iOS
Android

@adamgrzybowski adamgrzybowski requested a review from a team as a code owner July 11, 2023 19:26
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from fedirjh and removed request for a team July 11, 2023 19:26
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 11, 2023

@fedirjh Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh Are you bale to work on this one or should we reassign

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Jul 14, 2023

@mountiny Reviewing shortly. The linked issue is on hold for an upstream fix, so shouldn’t we open a similar upstream PR ?

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh I think we can go ahead with this fix now and @adamgrzybowski will follow up with some upstream pr fix, the main priority is on the resize and performance issue now but after that we should get fix upstream, we dotn want to be maintaining patches

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Jul 14, 2023

@adamgrzybowski I run into this error when applying the patch :

Screenshot 2023-07-14 at 10 05 37 PM

@adamgrzybowski
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @fedirjh I fixed the patch

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Jul 18, 2023

Thank you @adamgrzybowski , reviewing shortly.

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Jul 21, 2023

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Web.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
Chrome.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
Safari.mp4
Desktop
Desktop.mp4
iOS
IOS.mp4
Android
Android.mp4

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Jul 21, 2023

@adamgrzybowski @mountiny Are we aware of this bug ? The header is updated after navigation , this is not related to this PR:

Bug.mp4

@adamgrzybowski
Copy link
Contributor Author

I haven't seen any issue for that @fedirjh

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh Is thi happening on main as well? then we can probably proceed.

Do you think we can get through the checklist today? thanks!

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Jul 24, 2023

Is this happening on main as well?

Yes it's on main as well. Will report it on slack.

Do you think we can get through the checklist today?

Will do it shortly.

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Jul 25, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Jul 25, 2023

@adamgrzybowski Looks like we are missing testing steps.

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Jul 25, 2023

@adamgrzybowski Found this bug when trying to swipe and the keyboard is open , the chat header jumps to the middle of the screen , on main the keyboard is hidden after the swipe gesture is done.

CleanShot.2023-07-25.at.01.34.36.mp4

@adamgrzybowski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fedirjh I merged the newest main and it works fine now. Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh fedirjh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from mountiny July 25, 2023 11:28
@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Jul 25, 2023

@adamgrzybowski Could you please add QA testing steps ?

@adamgrzybowski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fedirjh Done!

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks everyone ❤️ 🚀

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 104e65a into Expensify:main Jul 25, 2023
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.46-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.47-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 1.3.46-2 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 1.3.47-6 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants