-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2023-04-18] [$8000] Manage member - User deleted offline becomes visible again when the Internet is turned off #15048
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @miljakljajic ( |
Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)
|
@miljakljajic Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick! |
1 similar comment
@miljakljajic Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick! |
I was able to reproduce this on mobile, but not on web: Adding the engineering label to confirm whether this can be worked on externally. WhatsApp.Video.2023-02-14.at.15.02.52.mp4 |
Triggered auto assignment to @chiragsalian ( |
What do you think @chiragsalian am I good to put the external label? Bear in mind that I've only been able to reproduce this on mobile so the scope is probably a bit narrower. |
I cannot reproduce the problem on ios or web. Also i think i see the issue. My theory is because the actions are done so fast that the API probably has not finished and the front end hasn't received the updated pusher data yet. Can you guys retest and this time after going online wait 10s and then go offline? |
Not overdue, waiting to hear back from others. |
@chiragsalian, @miljakljajic Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick! |
@miljakljajic / @kbecciv were you guys able to retest with the steps i mentioned here? I want to narrow down the source of the problem. |
@chiragsalian @miljakljajic this issue was created 2 weeks ago. Are we close to a solution? Let's make sure we're treating this as a top priority. Don't hesitate to create a thread in #expensify-open-source to align faster in real time. Thanks! |
Friendly bump here @miljakljajic / @kbecciv to retest. |
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.2.98-2 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-04-18. 🎊 After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:
|
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
|
@tienifr what's your upwork profile? Can you apply to the job: https://www.upwork.com/ab/applicants/1631061620690505728/job-details |
@miljakljajic I've applied, thanks! |
Reassigning so that someone else can pay promptly on Monday when I'm OOO! Contracts have been sent to both @tienifr and @aimane-chnaif :) |
Triggered auto assignment to @tjferriss ( |
Not overdue, PR in regression period. @aimane-chnaif could you look at the BZ checklist for this one? |
This issue existed from the beginning when we migrate policy API to remove policy members in #10452. I think it would be good to add something like this to regression test step: @grgia do you agree? |
Payments have been made via Upworks. |
@tjferriss thanks, I think this is also eligible for the PR timeline bonus since it's merged within 3 business days. |
@tienifr I thought that might have been why you both applied in Upworks for $12k, but when I was reviewing the issue it appears there are four days between the assignment and PR being merged. |
There was weekend. |
Not overdue, in payment step cc @tjferriss |
My mistake. That tool is incredibly helpful. I've just sent you both a bonus payments via Upworks. @grgia do you agree with @aimane-chnaif feedback here: #15048 (comment). If so, I think we can close this out. |
@tjferriss yes, I would agree. closing out! |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
Deleted users do not become visible
Actual Result:
User deleted offline becomes visible again
Workaround:
Unkown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Version Number: 1.2.69.2
Reproducible in staging?: Yes
Reproducible in production?: Yes
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation
Bug5932496_Record_2023-02-10-19-04-42_4f9154176b47c00da84e32064abf1c48.mp4
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause - internal Team
Slack conversation:
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: