Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Version 2.0 Draft #709

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Nov 7, 2019
Merged

Version 2.0 Draft #709

merged 11 commits into from
Nov 7, 2019

Conversation

CoralineAda
Copy link
Member

@CoralineAda CoralineAda commented Sep 27, 2019

Changes include:

  • Language updates to emphasize community over project scope
  • Additional examples of positive behavior
  • Clarification around sexual attention and advances
  • Community Impact Guidelines

Comments and questions in this issue: #710

@CoralineAda CoralineAda changed the title Version 1.5 Draft Version 2.0 Draft Sep 27, 2019
@CoralineAda CoralineAda mentioned this pull request Sep 27, 2019

## Attribution

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.5,
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this use the new version?


Community leaders are responsible for clarifying and enforcing our standards of acceptable behavior and will take appropriate and fair corrective action in response to any behavior that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive, or harmful.

Community leaders have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what about "Community leaders have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct. Community leaders are expected to communicate reasons for moderation decisions when appropriate."

At Airbnb, we're working on a CoC based on this branch and that's one missing piece we thought it may make sense to add. This helps promote transparency and avoids the issue that many OSS projects now face where the user base feels that admins acted unilaterally and against the interests of the community.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love it.


* Demonstrating empathy and kindness toward other people
* Being respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences
* Giving and gracefully acting on constructive feedback

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's worth noting that even though feedback may be constructive, there is constructive feedback that may not be acted on due to it either:

  1. Being an opinion where there is another equally acceptable proposed solution
  2. Due to time constraints, the scope of the change would increase significantly if the proposed feedback were implemented.

I think this is implied by "acting on", but perhaps we could find a way to better indicate that feedback will be treated respectfully and acknowledged, even if it is not actually used.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps it would be enough to say "accepting" constructive feedback?

@outlawlife
Copy link

outlawlife commented Oct 28, 2019 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants