-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: align expected node engine with volta #7998
Changes from 2 commits
1d0002f
707154c
0944233
a6099b3
19ae91c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ | |
"@stencil/state-tunnel": "1.0.1" | ||
}, | ||
"license": "SEE LICENSE.md", | ||
"volta": { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm removing volta at this level because a calcite-components consumer will not have the context of the monorepo to reference the volta node version. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The volta version is not for the calcite consumer. It is for automatically using the correct version of Node during development. Can you please add it back? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. since we should try to reserve the package.json published in the node module to only information needed by the consumer I think we should still leave volta out of the monorepo sub-packages package.json There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. If Volta adds another place to specify the development versions of node/npm then we can switch to that. But for now We are following the recommendation for monorepo setups in Volta's doc: The Can you add volta back here and then I'll approve the PR? Thanks! There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. after another discussion with Ben over teams I'm adding volta back to calcite-components |
||
"extends": "../../package.json" | ||
"engines": { | ||
"node": ">=16.0.0" | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be
>=18.18.0
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
anything over 18 will work. I wanted to keep it flexible but I can update