Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update to OpenCover 4.6.247-rc #2004

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 27, 2015
Merged

Update to OpenCover 4.6.247-rc #2004

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 27, 2015

Conversation

sharwell
Copy link
Member

I'm hoping this resolves the problem of await expressions always reporting only partial coverage.

See OpenCover/opencover#352.

@sharwell sharwell self-assigned this Dec 27, 2015
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 93.48%

Merging #2004 into stabilization will increase coverage by +14.15% as of e13e8e9

@@            stabilization   #2004   diff @@
=============================================
  Files                 559     559        
  Stmts               35163   35163        
  Branches             9749    2245   -7504
  Methods                                  
=============================================
+ Hit                 27898   32873   +4975
+ Partial              5704     745   -4959
+ Missed               1561    1545     -16

Review entire Coverage Diff as of e13e8e9

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

@pdelvo
Copy link
Member

pdelvo commented Dec 27, 2015

Great 👍

@sharwell sharwell added this to the 1.0.0 RC 3 milestone Dec 27, 2015
@sharwell sharwell assigned pdelvo and unassigned sharwell Dec 27, 2015
sharwell added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2015
@sharwell
Merge pull request #2004 from sharwell/update-opencover
7659ae9 
Update to OpenCover 4.6.247-rc
@sharwell sharwell merged commit 7659ae9 into DotNetAnalyzers:stabilization Dec 27, 2015
@sharwell sharwell deleted the update-opencover branch December 27, 2015 18:25
@pdelvo
Copy link
Member

pdelvo commented Dec 27, 2015

Do we also want to have this in master?

@sharwell
Copy link
Member Author

I'm going to merge stabilization into master after I take care of a few more RC 3 items.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@pdelvo pdelvo

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.0.0 RC 3
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@sharwell @codecov-io @pdelvo