Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tax 2 disappears when converting a purchase order into a supplier invoice #11335

Closed
nanoxp opened this issue Jun 13, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@nanoxp
Copy link

nanoxp commented Jun 13, 2019

Bug

Tax 2 disappears when converting a purchase order into a supplier invoice

Environment

  • Version: [9.0.3]
  • OS: [Ubuntu 18.04.2 lts]
  • Web server: [Apache 2.4.29]
  • PHP: [7.2.19]
  • Database: [*MySQL 5.7.26 *]

Expected and actual behavior

When converting a purchase order into a supplier invoice, taxes 1 and 2 taxes defined in the purchase order must be respected

Steps to reproduce the behavior

Dolibarr was set up to operate a second tax and the VAT tax rate + IEPS8 was created in the VAT Dictionary as shown below:
imagen
When generating a Purchase order where we add an item with this type of VAT (VAT + IEPS8) we see that if it correctly shows Tax 2 of 8%:
imagen
Validate and approve the purchase order to proceed to create invoice as shown below:
imagen
We observe in the previous image that if it correctly indicates the type of tax and amount tax 2, but when clicking "Create draft" and creating the supplier invoice, we see that tax 2 does not appear anymore or in the totals as in the line of each article :
imagen

Feature Request

When converting a purchase order into a supplier invoice, the taxes of 1 and 2 taxes defined in each article of the purchase order must be respected.

eldy added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2019
@eldy eldy closed this as completed in 8afffc8 Jun 17, 2019
@nanoxp
Copy link
Author

nanoxp commented Jun 17, 2019

I have applied the aforementioned correction and the problem persists with my report # 11335

@nanoxp
Copy link
Author

nanoxp commented Jun 17, 2019 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant