Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug/scaling relation scalar prediction #1191

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Aug 9, 2024

Conversation

DavidT3
Copy link
Owner

@DavidT3 DavidT3 commented Aug 9, 2024

No description provided.

DavidT3 added 12 commits August 9, 2024 12:12
…ction was to be made using a single value and no redshift and cosmology information was needed.
…ything - the predicted_y_errs array in the scalar prediction case was an array of length 1 and that was causing numpy/astropy to be upset. Sort of related to issue #1190
…needed to do was to set ez to 1. in cases where the x_values was scalar - rather than the an array of length 1
…r issue #1189) by ensuring the _fit_pars and _fit_par_errs attributes are actually arrays and not lists (like I passed in the other day, it broke everything)
…of allowed inverse abel methods to the inv_abel_data function. For issue #1188
…r the inverse_abel_data function for density calculation - for issue #1188
…(the added information on deprojection methods) issue #1188
@DavidT3 DavidT3 merged commit 6554e92 into master Aug 9, 2024
1 check passed
@DavidT3 DavidT3 deleted the bug/scalingRelationScalarPrediction branch August 9, 2024 17:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant