Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/cross arf generation and storage #1012

Merged
merged 29 commits into from
May 11, 2023
Merged

Conversation

DavidT3
Copy link
Owner

@DavidT3 DavidT3 commented May 11, 2023

No description provided.

DavidT3 added 29 commits May 5, 2023 15:48
…elete the files after it has generated them (sigh). Also corrected a small bug where XGA would have been looking in the temporary directory for the final files. For issue #917
…on_setup function there. I also added a first pass at a separate function for the generation of detmap commands. This will initially be used in cross_arfs, but also will eventually be used in the spectrum command generation section. For issue #917
…-arfs. The default is now set to 200, rather than the 100 which is used in spectrum generation (and is currently not user configurable). That has definitely sped up the calculation of cross-arfs. I'd say 200 is a reasonable default value. For issue #917
… info for each generation task. This will help us pass the cross arfs to the annular spectra. For issue #917
…used to generate a particular cross-arf to the extra_info. For issue #917
… should work this time around as I should have removed the annulus-identifying bug in my recent completion of the 'view spectra properly' branch. For issue #917
… cases like cross-arf generation were cross-arfs are being put in BaseProduct instances so they can be returned from execute_cmd in the existing framework. THis extra info argument will let me store stuff like the set_ident, annuli identifiers, etc. For issue #917
…quested detector maps already exist. For issue #917
…p generation commands, as I would forget to do it otherwise. Indirectly for issue #917
…e cross-arfs and store them in the correct annular spectrum. For issue #917
…etrieve a specific path instead of a set of them. Indirectly for issue #1010
… altered the minimum y value for when we're plotting normalised curves. For issue #1010
…-arfs. Currently just a copy of my original generalised XSPEC fit template, but with a message indicating it doesn't do anything and an exit. This will be developed in tandem with the Python interface, to make it easier to test, also I need to re-learn TCL again. For issue #917
@DavidT3 DavidT3 linked an issue May 11, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@DavidT3 DavidT3 merged commit 0e88fc8 into master May 11, 2023
@DavidT3 DavidT3 deleted the feat/crossARFGenerationAndStorage branch May 11, 2023 19:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add the option to generate annular spectra with cross-ARFs
1 participant