Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[QA] use lazy logging format #5400

Closed
wants to merge 41 commits into from

Conversation

AlexandreYang
Copy link
Member

@AlexandreYang AlexandreYang commented Jan 6, 2020

This PR should not be merged, it's used to QA #5398

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 6, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #5400 into master will increase coverage by 0.11%.
The diff coverage is 60.34%.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
yarn/datadog_checks/yarn/yarn.py 79.32% <ø> (ø)
spark/datadog_checks/spark/spark.py 82.44% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
ibm_db2/datadog_checks/ibm_db2/ibm_db2.py 89.91% <ø> (ø)
mapreduce/datadog_checks/mapreduce/mapreduce.py 70.53% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
.../datadog_checks/win32_event_log/win32_event_log.py 63.69% <ø> (+1.27%) ⬆️
kubelet/datadog_checks/kubelet/prometheus.py 80.87% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
oracle/datadog_checks/oracle/oracle.py 88.05% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
redisdb/datadog_checks/redisdb/redisdb.py 74.04% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
process/datadog_checks/process/process.py 75.16% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
wmi_check/datadog_checks/wmi_check/wmi_check.py 94.28% <ø> (ø)
... and 186 more

@AlexandreYang AlexandreYang force-pushed the alex/use_lazy_logging_format_QA branch from a6847b2 to 04f60b4 Compare January 6, 2020 21:15
@AlexandreYang AlexandreYang mentioned this pull request Jan 6, 2020
4 tasks
@dd-devflow dd-devflow bot deleted the alex/use_lazy_logging_format_QA branch February 7, 2024 00:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment