-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added kube_scheduler check #3371
Conversation
a82da7c
to
0aa1972
Compare
0aa1972
to
f0ce07e
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3371 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.95% 90.34% +4.38%
==========================================
Files 722 5 -717
Lines 36897 176 -36721
Branches 4355 12 -4343
==========================================
- Hits 31714 159 -31555
+ Misses 3959 14 -3945
+ Partials 1224 3 -1221 |
kube_scheduler/datadog_checks/kube_scheduler/data/conf.yaml.example
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
nice PR from a doc perspective :) I left some comments. |
thanks @l0k0ms for the review. |
64a0493
to
6975487
Compare
b3ef4b3
to
f2c88ea
Compare
@xvello PR updated following your comments |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for testing the two versions!
Some comments on the metadata + one nit on _summary_from_microseconds_to_second
f2c88ea
to
bc2d309
Compare
bc2d309
to
82bcc4a
Compare
@xvello, it should be good now :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking great!
Let's get a final decision on the apiserver client metrics before merging
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
move from py36 to py37 Co-Authored-By: clamoriniere <cedric.lamoriniere@gmail.com>
move from py36 to py37 Co-Authored-By: clamoriniere <cedric.lamoriniere@gmail.com>
thanks @ofek for the review. PR updated with your suggestions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚢
What does this PR do?
Introduce a new check: kube_scheduler
Motivation
Improves the Kubernetes core components integration
Additional Notes
Anything else we should know when reviewing?
Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)
changelog/
andintegration/
labels attached