[AI-4929] [LOI-381] Add logs for octopus_deploy

[sarah-witt]

What does this PR do?

Add logs integration for octopus deploy

Motivation

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

• Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
• Add the qa/skip-qa label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.
• If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

[thibaultkrebs]

Logs files configs looks to me. I have pushed the integration to our staging environment, feel free to test there.

The deploy logs will need no parsing since they are generated by the integration, but the server logs will. 

I am not super clear about your explanation here? Deploy logs are catch here and will be parsed by the grok parser?

I am a bit curious as well, it could still be useful to have an integration for server logs? If you want to setup properly the timestamp used for logs, or other info?

[thibaultkrebs]

The integration is available in our staging environment, I let you confirm this is working as intended for you 👍

[sarah-witt]

Thanks @thibaultkrebs, I tested on staging and confirmed the pipeline is working!

Review from drichards-87 is dismissed.
Related teams and files:

• documentation
  • octopus_deploy/assets/configuration/spec.yaml
  • octopus_deploy/datadog_checks/octopus_deploy/data/conf.yaml.example

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.94%. Comparing base (487ed41) to head (fd6696e).
Report is 104 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Flag	Coverage Δ
activemq	?
cassandra	?
hive	?
hivemq	?
ignite	?
jboss_wildfly	?
kafka	?
octopus_deploy	99.25% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
presto	?
solr	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[thibaultkrebs]

All good for me