Remove dd scan

[TonyCTHsu]

What does this PR do?

We are not really using those scans as they are not blocking

Change log entry

None.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.69%. Comparing base (65b2901) to head (6fdfe02).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4476      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.70%   97.69%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1379     1379              
  Lines       83881    83881              
  Branches     4251     4251              
==========================================
- Hits        81953    81945       -8     
- Misses       1928     1936       +8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[datadog-datadog-prod-us1]

Datadog Report

Branch report: tonycthsu/remove-dd-scan
Commit report: 6fdfe02
Test service: dd-trace-rb

✅ 0 Failed, 20626 Passed, 1373 Skipped, 3m 10.94s Total Time

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-03-12 09:13:30

Comparing candidate commit 6fdfe02 in PR branch tonycthsu/remove-dd-scan with baseline commit 65b2901 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 31 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

[ivoanjo]

Thoughts @anmarchenko? Since you were the one that added this in #3755

[anmarchenko]

Let's just remove this @ivoanjo, I have no evidence that additional static analysis from DD adds anything useful to the project