Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[NO-TICKET] Disable flaky barrier spec #4275

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

ivoanjo
Copy link
Member

@ivoanjo ivoanjo commented Jan 10, 2025

What does this PR do?

This PR disables a spec that's been flaky for a very long time (see https://github.com/DataDog/ruby-guild/issues/191, but I suspect I saw it back in https://github.com/DataDog/ruby-guild/issues/50#issuecomment-1874210356 ) and it just failed on me again:
https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-rb/actions/runs/12706052002/job/35418238631?pr=4234

I'm not sure this test is getting us a lot of value, so let's stop the flaky impact until we can dedicate time to fixing it.

(Maybe @lloeki can help here as the original author of the class and tests?)

Motivation:

Get to zero flaky tests in our codebase!

Change log entry

None

Additional Notes:

N/A

How to test the change?

Validate spec is now skipped.

**What does this PR do?**

This PR disables a spec that's been flaky for a very long time
(see DataDog/ruby-guild#191, but I suspect
I saw it back in DataDog/ruby-guild#50 (comment) )
and it just failed on me again:
https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-rb/actions/runs/12706052002/job/35418238631?pr=4234

I'm not sure this test is getting us a lot of value, so let's stop
the flaky impact until we can dedicate time to fixing it.

(Maybe @lloeki can help here as the original author of the class and
tests?)

**Motivation:**

Get to zero flaky tests in our codebase!

**Additional Notes:**

N/A

**How to test the change?**

Validate spec is now skipped.
@ivoanjo ivoanjo requested a review from a team as a code owner January 10, 2025 08:57
@ivoanjo ivoanjo added dev/testing Involves testing processes (e.g. RSpec) dev/internal Other internal work that does not need to be included in the changelog labels Jan 10, 2025
@datadog-datadog-prod-us1
Copy link
Contributor

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 bot commented Jan 10, 2025

Datadog Report

Branch report: ivoanjo/disable-flaky-barrier-spec
Commit report: f66f48a
Test service: dd-trace-rb

✅ 0 Failed, 22119 Passed, 1476 Skipped, 5m 31.51s Total Time

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.71%. Comparing base (08041d2) to head (f66f48a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4275      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.72%   97.71%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1354     1354              
  Lines       82450    82450              
  Branches     4236     4236              
==========================================
- Hits        80578    80566      -12     
- Misses       1872     1884      +12     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Jan 10, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-01-10 09:20:39

Comparing candidate commit f66f48a in PR branch ivoanjo/disable-flaky-barrier-spec with baseline commit 08041d2 in branch master.

Found 2 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 29 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

scenario:line instrumentation - targeted

  • 🟩 throughput [+9754.842op/s; +10592.725op/s] or [+6.243%; +6.780%]

scenario:method instrumentation

  • 🟩 throughput [+14136.406op/s; +14661.797op/s] or [+8.403%; +8.715%]

@ivoanjo ivoanjo merged commit 988a195 into master Jan 10, 2025
344 checks passed
@ivoanjo ivoanjo deleted the ivoanjo/disable-flaky-barrier-spec branch January 10, 2025 12:40
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 2.9.0 milestone Jan 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dev/internal Other internal work that does not need to be included in the changelog dev/testing Involves testing processes (e.g. RSpec)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants