-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 377
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v0 #1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
||
|
||
tracer = Datadog::Tracer.new() | ||
while true do |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
loop do
is more idiomatic
between the tracer and the submission so that things are fast.
marcotc
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2019
…urce-name Move resource name to method
ivoanjo
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2021
…s String I noticed a Ruby app where the configuration mismatch warning was popping up: ``` W, [2021-10-15T11:44:30.952540 #1] WARN -- ddtrace: [ddtrace] Configuration mismatch: values differ between "c.tracer.port" ('8126') and DD_TRACE_AGENT_PORT environment variable ('8126'). Using '8126'. ``` The warning was being triggered because we convert the values read from environment variables (`DD_TRACE_AGENT_PORT` or `DD_TRACE_AGENT_URL`) into integers, but this app had `c.tracer.port` specified as a string. Because or that, since we collect all values, call `#uniq` on them and see if we get more than one, the warning was being triggered since the `8126` integer is not the same as the `'8126'` string.
ivoanjo
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2023
The funny thing about this one is that this one is caused by `#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wexpansion-to-defined"` on GCC versions that don't the above warning. So as far as I understood it, this is what happened: 1. On a modern GCC, we had a warning caused by the Ruby headers (the "expansion-to-defined" warning). We couldn't do anything about it, so we ignored it. 2. On an older GCC, the warning from #1 is not known, so it emits a different warning: a warning that it doesn't know "expansion-to-defined". 3. So we now need to ignore the unknown pragma warning... ... lol computers.
2 tasks
ivoanjo
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2024
**What does this PR do?** This PR raises the minimum Ruby version required for heap profiling from the previous value of >= 2.7 to >= 3.1 due to a new VM bug discovered (see below for details). It's mostly a revert of #3366, where we had first tried to workaround a Ruby 2.7/3.0 bug, but it turns out we missed a spot, and we could trigger VM crashes because of that. **Motivation:** Ruby versions prior to 3.1 had a special optimization called `rb_gc_force_recycle` which would allow objects to directly be garbage collected (e.g. without needing to wait for the GC). It turns out that `rb_gc_force_recycle` did not play well with the changes in Ruby 2.7 to how object ids worked. We uncovered this earlier on during the development of the heap profiler, and put in a workaround for the bug that we thought was enough... Unfortunately, it turns out that the workaround is not enough. The following reproducer, when run on Ruby 2.7 or 3.0 shows how the Ruby VM can segfault inside `id2ref` due to the issue above: ```ruby puts RUBY_DESCRIPTION require "datadog" require "objspace" require "pry" NUM_OBJECTS = 10_000_000 recycled_ids = Array.new(NUM_OBJECTS) { 123 } many_objects = Array.new(NUM_OBJECTS) { Object.new } (0...NUM_OBJECTS).each do |i| recycled_ids[i] = many_objects[i].object_id end puts "Seeded objects!" gets (0...NUM_OBJECTS).each do |i| Datadog::Profiling::StackRecorder::Testing._native_gc_force_recycle(many_objects[i]) many_objects[i] = nil end puts GC.stat puts "Recycled objects!" gets many_objects = nil 10.times { GC.start } Array.new(10_000) { Object.new } 10.times { GC.start } puts GC.stat puts "GC'd objects! (Ruby should have released pages?)" gets recycled_ids.each { |i| begin (nil == ObjectSpace._id2ref(i)) rescue nil end } puts "Done!" ``` Crash details: ``` Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. is_swept_object (ptr=93825033355200, objspace=<optimised out>) at gc.c:3868 3868 return page->flags.before_sweep ? FALSE : TRUE; (gdb) bt #0 is_swept_object (ptr=93825033355200, objspace=<optimised out>) at gc.c:3868 #1 is_garbage_object (objspace=0x55555555d220, objspace=0x55555555d220, ptr=93825033355200) at gc.c:3887 #2 is_live_object (ptr=93825033355200, objspace=0x55555555d220) at gc.c:3909 #3 is_live_object (ptr=93825033355200, objspace=0x55555555d220) at gc.c:3898 #4 id2ref (objid=8264881) at gc.c:3999 #5 os_id2ref (os=<optimised out>, objid=<optimised out>) at gc.c:4019 ``` This crash happens because of two things: 1. Ruby does not clean the object id entry for a recycled object from its internal hash map 2. If the memory page where the object lived is returned back to the OS, trying to `id2ref` on that id will cause Ruby to try to read invalid memory and crash. **Additional Notes:** I've chosen to disable heap profiling on 2.7 and 3.0 because I can't think of a good workaround for the bug above, especially not one that does not increase the overhead of heap profiling. **How to test the change?** This PR updates the test coverage to expect Ruby 3.1+ as the minimum for the feature. You can also quickly validate it doesn't get enabled on the older Rubies using: ``` $ DD_PROFILING_ENABLED=true DD_PROFILING_EXPERIMENTAL_HEAP_ENABLED=true bundle exec ddprofrb exec ruby -e "puts RUBY_DESCRIPTION" W, [2024-12-02T10:42:28.771611 #112585] WARN -- datadog: [datadog] Current Ruby version (3.0.5) cannot support heap profiling due to VM bugs/limitations. Please upgrade to Ruby >= 3.1 in order to use this feature. Heap profiling has been disabled. ```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
first pass at a ruby client.