Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[netpath] Use remote hostname from core agent #34911

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pimlu
Copy link
Contributor

@pimlu pimlu commented Mar 7, 2025

What does this PR do?

Makes the traceroute module in system-probe query the core agent for the hostname

Motivation

Fixes a bug where the hostnames got out of sync

Describe how you validated your changes

Going to try this image on my EKS cluster

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@github-actions github-actions bot added team/agent-runtimes team/networks short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Mar 7, 2025
@pimlu pimlu added changelog/no-changelog qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Mar 7, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

dda inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=58172402 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 0fd1132

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor eb6d35ef1b3a2fee6dfdebbaa1fbce23751a4c87

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 821.13MB 821.12MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 821.13MB 821.12MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 812.09MB 812.08MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 811.33MB 811.33MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 802.31MB 802.31MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 39.29MB 39.29MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 39.37MB 39.37MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 39.37MB 39.37MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 37.82MB 37.82MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 440.53MB 440.53MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 62.13MB 62.13MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 62.20MB 62.20MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 62.20MB 62.20MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 59.35MB 59.35MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 59.42MB 59.42MB 0.50MB

Decision

✅ Passed

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Static quality checks ✅

Please find below the results from static quality gates

Successful checks

Info

Result Quality gate On disk size On disk size limit On wire size On wire size limit
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_amd64 785.22 MiB 801.8 MiB 191.45 MiB 202.62 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_arm64 776.55 MiB 793.14 MiB 173.4 MiB 184.51 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_amd64 785.23 MiB 801.79 MiB 193.14 MiB 205.03 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_arm64 776.51 MiB 793.09 MiB 175.56 MiB 186.44 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_amd64 785.25 MiB 801.81 MiB 193.14 MiB 205.03 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_arm64 776.61 MiB 793.14 MiB 175.56 MiB 186.44 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_amd64 37.54 MiB 47.67 MiB 9.73 MiB 19.78 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_arm64 36.14 MiB 46.27 MiB 8.44 MiB 18.49 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 37.54 MiB 47.67 MiB 9.74 MiB 19.79 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_suse_amd64 37.54 MiB 47.67 MiB 9.74 MiB 19.79 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_amd64 59.33 MiB 69.0 MiB 14.91 MiB 24.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_arm64 56.68 MiB 66.4 MiB 12.85 MiB 22.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_amd64 59.33 MiB 69.0 MiB 14.93 MiB 24.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_arm64 56.68 MiB 66.4 MiB 12.86 MiB 22.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_suse_amd64 59.33 MiB 69.0 MiB 14.93 MiB 24.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_amd64 869.9 MiB 886.12 MiB 292.66 MiB 304.21 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_arm64 884.55 MiB 900.79 MiB 278.95 MiB 290.47 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_amd64 1.04 GiB 1.06 GiB 367.75 MiB 379.33 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_arm64 1.05 GiB 1.06 GiB 350.02 MiB 361.55 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_amd64 45.69 MiB 55.78 MiB 17.23 MiB 27.28 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_arm64 44.33 MiB 54.45 MiB 16.11 MiB 26.16 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_amd64 264.82 MiB 274.78 MiB 106.28 MiB 116.28 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_arm64 280.75 MiB 290.82 MiB 101.1 MiB 111.12 MiB

Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 11a09a02-1565-4478-98a9-24989898efe6

Baseline: eb6d35e
Comparison: 0fd1132
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +1.16 [+1.09, +1.22] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.75 [+0.68, +0.82] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +0.30 [-2.47, +3.07] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.17 [-0.60, +0.94] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.03 [-0.76, +0.82] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.84, +0.90] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.02 [-0.62, +0.65] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.33, +0.33] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.03, +0.02] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.02 [-0.71, +0.67] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput -0.02 [-0.83, +0.78] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.03 [-0.49, +0.44] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.24 [-1.02, +0.55] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.38 [-1.22, +0.45] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.50 [-0.57, -0.43] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.66 [-0.81, -0.50] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/agent-runtimes team/networks
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant