-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[cluster-agent/languagedetection] Use strings.Builder to reduce allocations #34743
[cluster-agent/languagedetection] Use strings.Builder to reduce allocations #34743
Conversation
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=57759994 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit b064d4f |
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Diff per package
Decision✅ Passed |
Static quality checks ✅Please find below the results from static quality gates Successful checksInfo
|
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 71deb82 Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | +2.01 | [-0.92, +4.93] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | +1.20 | [+0.31, +2.09] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.22 | [+0.17, +0.28] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.43, +0.49] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.78, +0.81] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.70, +0.72] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.62, +0.64] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.27, +0.29] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.75, +0.75] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.03, +0.03] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.04 | [-0.85, +0.77] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.07 | [-0.13, -0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.14 | [-0.92, +0.64] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.19 | [-0.23, -0.16] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | -0.22 | [-0.28, -0.16] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.29 | [-1.07, +0.48] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
b662117
to
b064d4f
Compare
/merge |
View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.
The median merge time in
|
The backport to
To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal: # Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add .worktrees/backport-7.64.x 7.64.x
# Navigate to the new working tree
cd .worktrees/backport-7.64.x
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport-34743-to-7.64.x
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 0ad715c59d14da78787af7283fdf39c5c6c735a5
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport-34743-to-7.64.x
# Go back to the original working tree
cd ../..
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove .worktrees/backport-7.64.x Then, create a pull request where the |
What does this PR do?
This PR replaces string concatenations with a
strings.Builder
in theString
function ofcmd/cluster-agent/api/v1/languagedetection/util.go
.The goal is to reduce memory allocations and improve performance, as this function frequently appears in profiles with high CPU and memory usage.
Describe how you validated your changes
I checked that the log is printed with the expected format. We'll check improvement in CPU/memory when deploying on large clusters.