Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CWS-3771] Remove maps from mount resolver #34637

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 6, 2025

Conversation

YoannGh
Copy link
Contributor

@YoannGh YoannGh commented Mar 3, 2025

What does this PR do?

Replace Go maps in mount resolver by LRUs.

Motivation

Avoid leaking map entries.

Describe how you validated your changes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@YoannGh YoannGh added changelog/no-changelog team/agent-security qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Mar 3, 2025
@YoannGh YoannGh requested a review from a team as a code owner March 3, 2025 15:26
@YoannGh YoannGh changed the title [CWS] Remove maps from mount resolver [CWS] Remove maps from mount resolver Mar 3, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the medium review PR review might take time label Mar 3, 2025
@YoannGh YoannGh changed the title [CWS] Remove maps from mount resolver [CWS-3771] Remove maps from mount resolver Mar 3, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor a6dee66fdbf32e3d36d7497f8afc08d5816b6af7

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.13MB ⚠️ 806.19MB 806.06MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.13MB ⚠️ 815.97MB 815.83MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.13MB ⚠️ 815.31MB 815.18MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.13MB ⚠️ 825.10MB 824.98MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.13MB ⚠️ 825.10MB 824.98MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 39.46MB 39.46MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 39.54MB 39.54MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 39.54MB 39.54MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 37.99MB 37.99MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 440.86MB 440.86MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 62.14MB 62.14MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 62.21MB 62.21MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 62.20MB 62.20MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 59.36MB 59.36MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 59.43MB 59.43MB 0.50MB

Decision

⚠️ Warning

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

dda inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=57941679 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 242038c

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Static quality checks ✅

Please find below the results from static quality gates

Successful checks

Info

Result Quality gate On disk size On disk size limit On wire size On wire size limit
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_amd64 789.02MiB 801.8MiB 192.33MiB 202.62MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_arm64 780.22MiB 793.14MiB 174.08MiB 184.51MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_amd64 789.02MiB 801.79MiB 194.38MiB 205.03MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_arm64 780.3MiB 793.09MiB 175.8MiB 186.44MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_amd64 788.96MiB 801.81MiB 194.38MiB 205.03MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_arm64 780.19MiB 793.14MiB 175.8MiB 186.44MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_amd64 37.71MiB 47.67MiB 9.78MiB 19.78MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_arm64 36.3MiB 46.27MiB 8.48MiB 18.49MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 37.71MiB 47.67MiB 9.79MiB 19.79MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_suse_amd64 37.71MiB 47.67MiB 9.79MiB 19.79MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_amd64 59.33MiB 69.0MiB 14.91MiB 24.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_arm64 56.69MiB 66.4MiB 12.85MiB 22.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_amd64 59.33MiB 69.0MiB 14.93MiB 24.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_arm64 56.69MiB 66.4MiB 12.87MiB 22.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_suse_amd64 59.33MiB 69.0MiB 14.93MiB 24.8MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_amd64 873.69MiB 886.12MiB 293.94MiB 304.21MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_arm64 888.26MiB 900.79MiB 280.16MiB 290.47MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_amd64 1.05GiB 1.06GiB 369.03MiB 379.33MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_arm64 1.05GiB 1.06GiB 351.25MiB 361.55MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_amd64 45.86MiB 55.78MiB 17.3MiB 27.28MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_arm64 44.47MiB 54.45MiB 16.17MiB 26.16MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_amd64 265.09MiB 274.78MiB 106.42MiB 116.28MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_arm64 281.02MiB 290.82MiB 101.21MiB 111.12MiB

Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 82b38173-1902-4444-978f-70929bde6c97

Baseline: a6dee66
Comparison: 242038c
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.38 [-0.50, +1.27] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.03 [-0.85, +0.90] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.01 [-0.03, +0.05] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.01 [-0.83, +0.85] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.29, +0.31] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.78, +0.80] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.03, +0.03] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput -0.00 [-0.63, +0.63] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.70, +0.67] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.11 [-0.58, +0.36] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.12 [-0.89, +0.65] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.18 [-0.22, -0.15] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.61 [-0.67, -0.54] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.64 [-1.43, +0.14] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.68 [-0.74, -0.62] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -1.39 [-4.23, +1.44] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Comment on lines 618 to 623
mounts, err := simplelru.NewLRU[uint32, *model.Mount](8096, nil)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}

pidToMounts, err := cache.NewTwoLayersLRU[uint32, uint32, *model.Mount](1024 * 1024) // 1024 mounts for 1024 pids
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: could we define those numbers with named constants (even if they are not configurable)?

@YoannGh YoannGh force-pushed the yoanngh/mount-resolver-no-map branch from e56521f to 3d698db Compare March 5, 2025 14:19
Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Mar 5, 2025

Go Package Import Differences

Baseline: a6dee66
Comparison: 242038c

binaryosarchchange
security-agentlinuxamd64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/security/utils/lru/internal
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/security/utils/lru/simplelru
security-agentlinuxarm64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/security/utils/lru/internal
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/security/utils/lru/simplelru
system-probelinuxamd64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/security/utils/lru/internal
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/security/utils/lru/simplelru
system-probelinuxarm64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/security/utils/lru/internal
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/security/utils/lru/simplelru

@YoannGh YoannGh force-pushed the yoanngh/mount-resolver-no-map branch 2 times, most recently from 55d9d8e to 528cad4 Compare March 6, 2025 10:32
@YoannGh YoannGh force-pushed the yoanngh/mount-resolver-no-map branch from 528cad4 to 242038c Compare March 6, 2025 14:44
@YoannGh
Copy link
Contributor Author

YoannGh commented Mar 6, 2025

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Mar 6, 2025

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.
2025-03-06 16:50:08 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2025-03-06 16:50:12 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 30m.


2025-03-06 17:44:45 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 52037e3 into main Mar 6, 2025
284 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the yoanngh/mount-resolver-no-map branch March 6, 2025 17:44
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.65.0 milestone Mar 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog component/system-probe medium review PR review might take time qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/agent-security
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants