-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove unnecessary logic #34616
Remove unnecessary logic #34616
Conversation
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=57479044 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit d9998fc |
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Diff per package
Decision✅ Passed |
Static quality checks ✅Please find below the results from static quality gates Successful checksInfo
|
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 96cdcd7 Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | +3.31 | [+2.34, +4.28] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | +0.24 | [+0.19, +0.29] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.13 | [+0.09, +0.17] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.75, +0.78] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.61, +0.64] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.04, +0.02] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.80, +0.79] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.31, +0.29] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.80, +0.76] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | -0.03 | [-0.85, +0.80] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.03 | [-0.73, +0.67] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | -0.06 | [-0.52, +0.41] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.10 | [-0.16, -0.05] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.14 | [-0.91, +0.63] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.33 | [-0.38, -0.27] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -1.15 | [-4.00, +1.70] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
/merge |
View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.
The median merge time in
|
What does this PR do?
The converter had some logic to pull api key and site from core config for ddprofiling extension (added in #34192). However, we only have the core config in
otel-agent
path, and in this path the api key/site is not needed because profiles are uploaded to the trace agent component. API key and site is only necessary in OSS collector path, in which case we won't have core config, so this logic will never run either.Motivation
Describe how you validated your changes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes