Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(oob): modexp lead constraints #306

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2024

Conversation

lorenzogentile404
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Collaborator

@letypequividelespoubelles letypequividelespoubelles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lorenzogentile404 lorenzogentile404 merged commit 7c44dc5 into master Aug 23, 2024
2 checks passed
@lorenzogentile404 lorenzogentile404 deleted the fix/issue-305/oob-modexp-constraints branch August 23, 2024 06:49
@@ -878,13 +878,13 @@
(call-to-LT 1 0 (prc-modexp-lead---ebs) 0 32))

(defconstraint prc-modexp-lead---compare-ebs-and-cds (:guard (* (standing-hypothesis) (prc-hypothesis) (prc-modexp-lead-hypothesis)))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Question: why do we have both (prc-hypothesis) and (prc-modexp-lead-hypothesis) ? Is that in the spec ?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(:guard (* (standing-hypothesis) (prc-modexp-lead-hypothesis))) should be sufficient for all of these.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

fix(oob): modexp constraints
3 participants