Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: hash registry with statestorer #564

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ivokub
Copy link
Collaborator

@ivokub ivokub commented Dec 4, 2024

Continuation of #560.

@ivokub
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ivokub commented Dec 4, 2024

Depends on Consensys/bavard#9, but when upgrading to this version, then also introduced a lot of other changes in the generated code.

(removed dependency on the upgrade to avoid unrelated code generation updates)

@ivokub ivokub self-assigned this Dec 9, 2024
@ivokub ivokub marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2024 11:16
@ivokub ivokub added the consolidate strengthen an existing feature label Dec 9, 2024
hash/doc.go Show resolved Hide resolved
hash/hashes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ivokub ivokub force-pushed the feat/hash-statestorer-registry branch from 4d48360 to 4b111bc Compare December 10, 2024 21:14
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ivokub ivokub left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resolved issues. Also rebased on top of master due to bavard upgrade.

hash/doc.go Show resolved Hide resolved
hash/hashes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ivokub ivokub requested a review from gbotrel December 10, 2024 21:16
@ivokub ivokub merged commit be3c2bb into master Dec 11, 2024
5 checks passed
@ivokub ivokub deleted the feat/hash-statestorer-registry branch December 11, 2024 08:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
consolidate strengthen an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants