Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "fix: fix incorrect MinerGetBaseInfo (#4617)" #4627

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2024

Conversation

LesnyRumcajs
Copy link
Member

This reverts commit d4408ae.

Summary of changes

Changes introduced in this pull request:

Reference issue to close (if applicable)

Closes

Other information and links

Change checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code,
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation,
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if possible),
  • I have made sure the CHANGELOG is up-to-date. All user-facing changes should be reflected in this document.

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs requested a review from a team as a code owner August 7, 2024 12:36
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs requested review from lemmih and sudo-shashank and removed request for a team August 7, 2024 12:36
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 7, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Aug 7, 2024
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 7, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit b8d5f3b Aug 7, 2024
30 checks passed
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs deleted the revert-incorrect-miner-get-base-info branch August 7, 2024 13:36
LesnyRumcajs added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2024
LesnyRumcajs added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants