Bug Report: 0.1.24-alpha-b17

[E3V3A]

---

Test Device: Samsung Galaxy S4-mini (GT-I9195), stock JB4.2.2, Enforcing

Database viewer

• Default MCC Locations are not showing the "number" of items as in the other tables. I.e. "3/43".

In Map Viewer:

• At first start, only the "blue" currently connected BTS shown, even if OCID data have already been loaded.
• Then, if you hit download OCID data (while in viewer), map updates correctly showing all "green" OCID (?) BTS towers.
• All "green" BTS's show Samples: as "-1", when viewing pin details.
• Changing Map Type (1) take you back to "Device Details"
• Changing Map Type (2) to "Satellite", doesn't allow zooming in, only "out".
• Changing Map Type (3) to "Hybrid", is the same as "Normal"
• App refuses to shutdown after "Quit", or perhaps starts up again, when trying to disable Location Services (GPS). Somehow, when GPS has once been started from AIMSICD and then closed, the app attempts to start up again.

Installation

• At installation, app asks to enable GPS, before showing disclaimer window.
• Disclaimer window buttons should have [Cancel] and [OK] buttons stacked, with text next to buttons. (This is not a bug, just proposed adjustment.)

---

Test Device: Samsung Galaxy S2 (GT-I9100), SlimKat KK4.4.2b4

• Device Details: Network Information is initially absent/erroneous. Provider Name/Code is empty, LAC/CID are "-1" etc.
• Database Viewer: Tables Cell Data and Location Data are empty.
• Slide Menu remain highlighted after selecting an item and then using back button.
• App seem to crash a while after receiving a phone call...

Question:
Can we get the last time of data upload, for a particular API KEY, from the OCID API?
Would be good to be able to inform the user about this 20 day new BTS upload limitation...

[SecUpwN]

@E3V3A, with #191 merged, would you please use the WIP-Internal v0.1.25-alpha-build-1 from our internal testing room to verify which errors still persist? Also, please refrain from opening new "monster Issues" for upcoming versions. I consider it better opening separate, linkable Issues. Thanks!

[SecUpwN]

@E3V3A, I know you hate to be "mentioned", but would you please reconfirm all of these bugs?

[SecUpwN]

Are you ignoring me on purpose here, @E3V3A? Would you please re-verify all these? I know you have much on your plate, but filing an Issue is easier than to maintain one and stay on track. Please do it.

[E3V3A]

Oooh @SecUpwN that hurts. I'd never ignore you, just trying to get some things done, so I have to prioritize other stuff. Anyway. Yep, all these are outdated and mostly fixed. We can close this now.