Error in ViewBatch.py: float argument required

[braymp]

Browsing this ViewBatch page returns the following error (using 2.1.1: 6c2d8960):

A problem occurred in a Python script. Here is the sequence of function calls leading up to the error, in the order they occurred.

 /imaging/docs/People/imageweb/batchprofiler/BatchProfiler/ViewBatch.py in ()
    659         
    660 with bputilities.CellProfilerContext():
    661     doc = ViewBatchDoc()
=>  662     doc.build()
    663 doc.render()
doc = <bpformdata.ViewBatchDoc object>, doc.build = <bound method ViewBatchDoc.build of <bpformdata.ViewBatchDoc object>>
 /imaging/docs/People/imageweb/batchprofiler/BatchProfiler/ViewBatch.py in build(self=<bpformdata.ViewBatchDoc object>)
     66             self.build_submit_run()
     67         else:
=>   68             self.build_batch()
     69     
     70     def read_batch(self):
self = <bpformdata.ViewBatchDoc object>, self.build_batch = <bound method ViewBatchDoc.build_batch of <bpformdata.ViewBatchDoc object>>
 /imaging/docs/People/imageweb/batchprofiler/BatchProfiler/ViewBatch.py in build_batch(self=<bpformdata.ViewBatchDoc object>)
    203                 self.build_database_scripts()
    204             with self.tag("div", style='clear:both; padding-top:10px'):
=>  205                 self.build_job_table()
    206             with self.tag("div", style='clear:both; padding-top:10px'):
    207                 self.build_footer()
self = <bpformdata.ViewBatchDoc object>, self.build_job_table = <bound method ViewBatchDoc.build_job_table of <bpformdata.ViewBatchDoc object>>
 /imaging/docs/People/imageweb/batchprofiler/BatchProfiler/ViewBatch.py in build_job_table(self=<bpformdata.ViewBatchDoc object>)
    449             with self.tag("table", klass="run_table"):
    450                 self.build_job_table_head()
=>  451                 self.build_job_table_body()
    452     
    453     def build_job_table_head(self):
self = <bpformdata.ViewBatchDoc object>, self.build_job_table_body = <bound method ViewBatchDoc.build_job_table_body of <bpformdata.ViewBatchDoc object>>
 /imaging/docs/People/imageweb/batchprofiler/BatchProfiler/ViewBatch.py in build_job_table_body(self=<bpformdata.ViewBatchDoc object>)
    521                                 "class":"success_message"}):                            
    522                                 cpu = task.get_runtime()
=>  523                                 self.text("Complete (%.2f sec)" % cpu)
    524                     else:
    525                         with self.tag("td", style='color:red'):
self = <bpformdata.ViewBatchDoc object>, self.text = <bound method Doc.text of <yattag.doc.Doc object>>, cpu = None
<type 'exceptions.TypeError'>: float argument required, not NoneType 
      args = ('float argument required, not NoneType',) 
      message = 'float argument required, not NoneType'

[LeeKamentsky]

Is it blocking you?

[braymp]

It may be blocking a collaborator. I think I've seen this error before, but got around it by resubmitting; I suggested it to her, and she may be able to keep moving.

[LeeKamentsky]

Mark - I've patched imagewebrhel6 to get it to display the page when the error happens, but where it would say "complete", the job is blank. Could you tell me if you're seeing that? I need to see a case of it before I can figure out why it's happening.

[braymp]

Yep, definitely seen it. Here's an instance from a collaborator:
http://imagewebrhel6/batchprofiler/cgi-bin/ViewBatch.py?batch_id=81

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:27 PM, LeeKamentsky notifications@github.com
wrote:

Mark - I've patched imagewebrhel6 to get it to display the page when the
error happens, but where it would say "complete", the job is blank. Could
you tell me if you're seeing that? I need to see a case of it before I can
figure out why it's happening.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#15 (comment)
.

[braymp]

Taking a look at the same ViewBatch page, some do show up as "Error", but most still show "Submitted" or "Running" when neither is the case. Should I open a new issue?

[LeeKamentsky]

I'd do neither. I think #12 covers the case where jobs are in the "running" state after they fail and the submitted jobs are either another manifestation of #12 or they are covered by #2.

Is it ok to close this and let #2 and #12 cover what happened to batch 81?

[braymp]

Makes sense; re-closing.